U.S. President Donald Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Well being and Human Providers Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Administrator for the Facilities for Medicare & Medicaid Providers Mehmet Oz look on throughout a rural well being roundtable on January 16, 2026 in Washington, DC.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Pictures
cover caption
toggle caption
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Pictures
A nationwide experiment to provide well being care in rural America a $50 billion makeover is underway.
The Trump administration, in a late December announcement, revealed how a lot every state will get underneath an bold 5-year initiative often known as the Rural Well being Transformation Program.
“This can be a huge effort to vary an unlucky actuality that has occurred to rural well being care in America,” Dr. Mehmet Oz, head of the Facilities for Medicare and Medicaid Providers, advised reporters because the awards went out, “which is that your zip code has began to foretell your life expectancy.”
Analysis exhibits individuals are extra more likely to die youthful in rural communities in comparison with cities, and the disparity has grown over the past three many years.
Congress created this new pot of cash final summer season. States got simply 52 days to tug collectively purposes and description how they might use the funding to enhance outcomes, develop the agricultural well being care workforce and drive innovation.
Every state is assured $100 million a 12 months over the following 5 years. The remainder of the cash was awarded based mostly on a collection of things — together with how rural a state is, what states suggest to do with the cash and whether or not the states undertake insurance policies aligned with the administration’s Make America Wholesome Once more priorities.
There’s bipartisan pleasure about rural well being lastly getting some consideration and funding. Democrats and plenty of well being coverage consultants argue, nonetheless, that this momentary $50 billion infusion pales compared to the roughly $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid and Obamacare, additionally handed by Congress final 12 months.
“There’s lots of nice issues in these proposals,” stated Kevin Bennett, director of the Heart for Rural and Main Healthcare on the College of South Carolina. “However I feel if we actually needed to rework [rural health care], they might have gone quite a bit additional.”
Bennett spoke on a panel in regards to the new funding co-hosted by the well being coverage information group Tradeoffs and the Leonard Davis Institute of Well being Economics on the College of Pennsylvania.
Listed here are a number of different key issues to know in regards to the Rural Well being Transformation Program:
Why was the Rural Well being Transformation Program created?
Congress added the agricultural funding to President Trump’s huge tax and spending invoice — generally referred to as the Massive Lovely Invoice — handed by Republicans final July. At the final minute, Congress doubled the funds for this system from $25 billion to $50 billion.
The brand new funding was included partly to fulfill some Republicans lawmakers who feared that main cuts to federal Medicaid funding would threaten the viability of rural hospitals. Almost 200 rural hospitals have closed since 2005, and one other 432 are susceptible to closure, in response to a current report.
However the Trump administration pushed states to assume extra broadly about rural well being, telling them they will solely use as much as 15% of this new funding for direct funds to suppliers.
“The aim of this fund is to not pay working bills,” Oz advised reporters in December. “The aim of this $50 billion funding is to permit us to right-size the system and to take care of the basic hindrances of enchancment in rural well being care.”
How a lot cash did every state obtain?
Awards for the primary 12 months vary from New Jersey’s $147 million to $281 million for Texas.
Massive rural states like Texas, Alaska, California and Montana obtained probably the most cash, however in response to an evaluation from the well being coverage analysis group KFF, some small states like New Jersey, Rhode Island and Massachusetts obtained considerably extra per rural resident.
Paula Chatterjee, a doctor and researcher on the College of Pennsylvania did an evaluation forward of the awards being introduced that discovered what she referred to as a “mismatch” in how funds have been focused in comparison with the place the best rural affected person wants are.
“If you happen to take a look at the place funding per rural resident goes underneath this program, it isn’t going to states which have the very best rural mortality charges,” Chatterjee stated on the current panel. “It is not going to states which might be projected to have the best reductions in federal Medicaid spending. It is not going to locations which might be dropping probably the most hospital beds.”
How do states plan to make use of this funding?
Plenty of states went after the brand new cash to fund extra telehealth, deploy synthetic intelligence and broaden the agricultural well being care workforce.
States took on workforce shortages from many angles. Delaware requested for cash to launch a brand new medical faculty. Alaska plans to spend funds on housing and youngster take care of its well being care employees. California desires to spend money on a workforce mapping and planning device. Many states stated they might create extra residency and fellowships for medical doctors and make it simpler for nurses, pharmacists and different well being employees to do extra.
“Numerous the workforce proposals in these are tried and true strategies,” Bennett stated. “Pipeline growth, incentive applications, mortgage reimbursement, all of these types of issues we all know might be efficient.”
Will new rural funding make up for anticipated federal Medicaid cuts?
The identical laws that created the Rural Well being Transformation Program additionally reduce federal Medicaid spending by practically $1 trillion over the following decade. A KFF evaluation estimates that $137 billion of these cuts will hit rural areas — practically triple the quantity of the brand new rural well being fund.
Rural well being advocates say the looming cuts will depart hospitals struggling to outlive, making it troublesome to completely benefit from the agricultural funding alternative.
“It is actually arduous to consider transformation in the event you’re attempting to maintain your doorways open and staff employed and sufferers served,” Bennett stated.
What occurs subsequent?
CMS launched an Workplace of Rural Well being Transformation, which can oversee this system and supply help to states, in response to federal well being officers. Most states are planning to have their well being departments or Medicaid workplaces handle their new initiatives.
States are anticipated to start out work on their implementation instantly, with awards for 2027 on account of be introduced in October 2026.
Among the cash comes with strings. States may get larger awards by promising to undertake well being insurance policies highlighted by the administration in its name for proposals.. But when states fail to go these insurance policies, they are going to obtain much less cash in future years and may very well be pressured to repay funds they already obtained.
In response to federal well being officers, 24 states promised to reinstate the Presidential Health Check in faculties; thirty-three states stated they have already got or would add restrictions to their meals help applications to make it more durable for folks to purchase soda and different unhealthy gadgets; and 18 states obtained factors for repealing or limiting certificates of want legal guidelines, which require well being care suppliers to show to state regulators that new companies or amenities are wanted earlier than they will open up store.
Oz stated he sees this as a device for governors to push insurance policies by doubtlessly uncooperative legislatures.
“This isn’t a risk,” Oz stated. “That is truly an empowering factor of the One Massive Lovely Invoice.”
