Karen Learn received regardless of Choose Cannone and the hackerama

Now you recognize why they don’t permit cameras within the federal courts.

They don’t need all people discovering out simply how corrupt the judicial system is, prime to backside. If folks might watch extra of those high-profile trials, and even simply stream the audio on-line as they’re driving round, have you learnt how outraged they’d turn into?

About as outraged because the voters in Norfolk County are after watching the tried lynching of Karen Learn.

Choose Beverly Cannone’s appalling conduct was nearly past parody, her prejudices so out within the open, her dedication to guard her beloved hackerama so apparent.

On Wednesday night time, after the decision, Opinion Diagnostics did a fast ballot of registered voters in Norfolk County. Solely 18 p.c of the respondents permitted of Choose Auntie Bev’s conduct within the case.

Eighteen p.c — that should signify how many individuals within the pattern didn’t watch a second of the trial, as a result of if that they had, they’d be as disgusted as the opposite 82 p.c about how desperately the hacks had been attempting to border an harmless girl, to guard themselves and their vile fellow payroll patriots.

The day after the decision, I requested Alan Jackson, the lead lawyer for the protection, if he’d had any doubts about his capacity to get a good trial for his consumer.

“I used to be in huge doubt,” he mentioned. “Did I doubt whether or not I might get a good trial? Nearly each single minute of each single day.”

He talked about how one in all his witnesses, almost definitely Dr. Marie Russell, the very plausible knowledgeable on canine bites, was nearly prevented from telling the jury some very primary truths concerning the wounds on the sufferer’s arm.

“That is nonetheless stunning to me,” Jackson mentioned. “Each query I requested was objected to by Hank Brennan, and 100% of his objections had been sustained. I’ve by no means seen that in 30 years of apply. Actually, 49 objections and 49 sustained objections.”

That sort of gross miscarriage of justice by no means occurs on Netflix, does it? However that is actual life. In Norfolk County, at the very least.

“Speak about attempting to maintain the knowledge from the jurors! I needed to ask the questions 17 instances in 5 completely different instructions to get the knowledge in entrance of the jury. I’ve by no means had a scenario the place the choose sustained each single objection by the prosecution. Statistically, that’s unattainable.”

Besides in a Norfolk County courtroom.

“I didn’t really feel this was an neutral choose,” he continued. “I simply didn’t. I don’t suppose anyone who was watching would argue with that. This was probably the most difficult case I’ve ever tried in my life. We didn’t win due to the method. We received regardless of the method that was put in place in that Dedham courtroom. It was a travesty, an absolute travesty.”

Would Jackson wish to say something to the choose?

“Do higher,” he mentioned. “Don’t attempt to put your thumb on the size. No choose ought to ever attempt to put your thumb on the size.”

Besides in Massachusetts. Right here it’s SOP — commonplace working process.

As a result of he lives in California and doesn’t apply a lot right here, Jackson might afford to be extra candid than native attorneys. However even he mentioned, “I’ve to watch out…”

The issue is, if a lawyer publicly calls out a choose over their appalling conduct, the repercussions might be extreme. You don’t even have to be a lawyer. Once I was jammed up in a civil case involving a radio contract just a few years again, I had the regulation on my facet. However not the judges.

As one of many legal professionals for my foes sneeringly advised me, “You suppose any choose in Massachusetts goes to present you a good shake after what you’ve written about them?”

Unhappy to say, he was proper. This state sucks, what can I say?

Within the halls of justice, the one justice is within the halls. As I at all times say, it’s not that each one Massachusetts judges are corrupt. It’s simply that 98% of them who give such a nasty identify to the opposite 2%.

And suppose what they will do to a training lawyer. Karen Learn’s native lawyer, David Yannetti, needs to be much more prudent in his feedback about this current travesty of justice in Dedham.

As a distinct lawyer texted me Friday:

“If a Mass. atty. dared to complain of the outrageous antics of Choose Bev to the Judicial Conduct Fee, the lawyer who complained can be blackballed by your complete state judiciary. Undeniable fact. That lawyer and regulation agency will now not obtain any kind of favorable judgments and rulings and all instances will go towards them for daring to show judicial malfeasance. That is how the mob often called the Mass. judiciary will get to thrive and bastardize justice.

“P.S. Search for odd judicial rulings towards Yannetti in any future state instances his agency has.”

I hope not. However one factor we all know for positive: Nothing goes to occur to Auntie Bev. Hell, even Choose Shelley Joseph just isn’t going to get greater than a slap on the wrist for letting a profession felony unlawful alien drug supplier out the again door of her courtroom home. She didn’t miss a single paycheck. The taxpayers paid for her total authorized protection after she was indicted by the feds.