To the editor: The query that I had when studying tradition critic Mary McNamara’s column on Meghan Markle’s present is, why does Markle need to be relatable and is that even her intent (“Why is Meghan Markle losing her time ‘With Love’ when she might simply return to appearing?” Sept. 5)? Many exhibits enchantment to area of interest audiences and function aspirational or escapist programming. Let’s ask ourselves, why is the expectation that Markle’s ought to differ? What is that this curious fascination with needing to see her be relatable? I consider Markle ought to preserve going and do no matter it’s that she needs to do in her profession and life.
Carla Roberts, Anaheim
..
To the editor: I’m a 79-year-old retired Realtor dwelling in Los Angeles who loves cooking and adorning exhibits, and I encourage to vary with McNamara’s column. I watched all of Season 1 and liked it. My husband, who additionally enjoys the present, and I are actually watching Season 2. We really tried a few Markle’s recipes, and so they have been scrumptious.
Will we add flowers to our meals? No. Are we bothered that she does? No. Can we afford a cottage for candle-making, and many others.? No. Does this evoke pangs of wealth disparity in us? No. Did I even know that was a $498 Eileen Fisher sweater? Heavens, no, nor do I care.
Joan Moon, Los Angeles
