By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Scoopico
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
Reading: Supreme Courtroom slaps down activist judges, Democratic AGs
Share
Font ResizerAa
ScoopicoScoopico
Search

Search

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel

Latest Stories

Kalshi locks in  billion valuation, gaining slight edge over its fierce rival Polymarket
Kalshi locks in $22 billion valuation, gaining slight edge over its fierce rival Polymarket
ICE Detains Canadian Mom and Autistic Daughter, Family Claims Trauma
ICE Detains Canadian Mom and Autistic Daughter, Family Claims Trauma
Super Micro co-founder indicted on Nvidia smuggling charges quit board
Super Micro co-founder indicted on Nvidia smuggling charges quit board
Opinion | ‘The Doppelganger Is at the Wheel’
Opinion | ‘The Doppelganger Is at the Wheel’
Today’s Quordle Answers and Hints for March 21, 2026
Today’s Quordle Answers and Hints for March 21, 2026
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved
Supreme Courtroom slaps down activist judges, Democratic AGs
Opinion

Supreme Courtroom slaps down activist judges, Democratic AGs

Scoopico
Last updated: June 28, 2025 12:04 pm
Scoopico
Published: June 28, 2025
Share
SHARE



A Supreme Courtroom ruling slapping down activist judges attempting to dam President Trump marks a bitter defeat for Democrats and AGs like Andrea Campbell pretending they’ve a job in deciding nationwide coverage.

“BIG WIN,” Trump posted minutes after the choice, which limits federal judges from blocking the president’s govt orders with nationwide injunctions.

“It’s a large,” Trump added at a press convention taking a victory lap over the choice.

The 6-3 ruling didn’t handle the constitutionality of Trump’s ban on birthright citizenship, nevertheless it retains activist judges and, by extension, Attorneys Common from attempting to journey up Trump at each flip via lawsuits and court docket rulings.

Surprised Democrats known as the choice a “devastating blow” and instantly took to social media and press conferences to whine and complain concerning the excessive court docket and Trump.

“Immediately’s ruling within the birthright citizenship case means only one factor – none of our rights are protected from this administration’s assaults,” Sen. Ed Markey wrote in a wildly exaggerated put up., which was included in a Markey fundraising e-mail.

Markey, who’s up for reelection subsequent yr, is clearly competing to be the main progressive within the state, however is definitely a part of the “gerontocracy” that youthful Democrats try to oust.

Different Democrats, led by Campbell, simply mentioned they have been “disenchanted” however vowed to struggle the case to guard birthright citizenship.

“We sit up for demonstrating why nationwide reduction on this case is critical, because the court docket has invited us to do,” mentioned Campbell, who, together with different Democratic AGs, filed a lawsuit difficult Trump’s govt order.

Keep on with Massachusetts, please, AG Campbell, and do your job – which is indicting criminals.

Campbell, whose final job was Boston Metropolis Councilor, has been an enormous disappointment. She is trying to match Gov. Maura Healey within the variety of lawsuits filed towards the president, however the excessive court docket ruling is a critical blow to her makes an attempt to inject herself into nationwide politics.

Trump has brazenly complained for months concerning the Democrats’ technique of utilizing the courts to limit his energy.

Democrats had efficiently blocked a lot of Trump’s agenda via greater than 40 injunctions from Democratic liberal judges in decrease courts.

However these days could quickly be over. They’ll have to seek out one other method. Perhaps just a few extra “No Kings” rallies?

The excessive court docket determination Friday was written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, one in all six conservative justices on the court docket.

The standing of birthright citizenship stays unclear, although infants born to unlawful immigrants will nonetheless be thought of residents for no less than 30 days.

ICE officers want classes in de-escalation
Opinion | Gavin Newsom Is Embracing Contradiction
Government workers can protest, with limits
Contributor: The White Home intends to slash the schooling security web
If California has to allow oil extraction, it should impose a tax
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print

POPULAR

Kalshi locks in  billion valuation, gaining slight edge over its fierce rival Polymarket
Money

Kalshi locks in $22 billion valuation, gaining slight edge over its fierce rival Polymarket

ICE Detains Canadian Mom and Autistic Daughter, Family Claims Trauma
top

ICE Detains Canadian Mom and Autistic Daughter, Family Claims Trauma

Super Micro co-founder indicted on Nvidia smuggling charges quit board
News

Super Micro co-founder indicted on Nvidia smuggling charges quit board

Opinion | ‘The Doppelganger Is at the Wheel’
Opinion

Opinion | ‘The Doppelganger Is at the Wheel’

Today’s Quordle Answers and Hints for March 21, 2026
Sports

Today’s Quordle Answers and Hints for March 21, 2026

Mistral's Small 4 consolidates reasoning, vision and coding into one model — at a fraction of the inference cost
Tech

Mistral's Small 4 consolidates reasoning, vision and coding into one model — at a fraction of the inference cost

Scoopico

Stay ahead with Scoopico — your source for breaking news, bold opinions, trending culture, and sharp reporting across politics, tech, entertainment, and more. No fluff. Just the scoop.

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?