In a dramatic escalation of Hollywood’s newest takeover brawl, Paramount Skydance mentioned Monday it’s going to launch a proxy struggle at Warner Bros. Discovery and sue in Delaware to pry unfastened extra particulars in regards to the firm’s pending take care of Netflix—strikes geared toward derailing that transaction and advancing its personal hostile, all‑money provide.
Paramount Skydance plans to appoint its personal slate of administrators for election at Warner Bros. Discovery’s 2026 annual assembly and to induce shareholders to vote in opposition to the Netflix settlement if WBD calls a particular or early assembly to approve it. The technique is designed to reshape the board that twice rejected Paramount’s bid and to rally buyers behind a rival deal Ellison insists is superior on each worth and danger.
“WBD has offered more and more novel causes for avoiding a transaction with Paramount, however what it has by no means mentioned, as a result of it can’t, is that the Netflix transaction is financially superior to our precise provide,” Paramount CEO David Ellison wrote in a letter to Warner shareholders.
On the similar time, Paramount has filed a lawsuit in Delaware Chancery Court docket in search of to drive Warner Bros. Discovery to reveal extra details about the way it valued the Netflix transaction and the deliberate spin-off of WBD’s world cable networks right into a separate public firm. Paramount argues that with out these particulars—notably across the remedy of debt and the board’s “danger adjustment” of its $30‑per‑share all‑money proposal—buyers can’t make an knowledgeable alternative between the 2 competing paths.
Competing visions for WBD
Below Paramount Skydance’s hostile bid, the Ellison‑led firm is providing $30 in money for each Warner Bros. Discovery share, in search of to accumulate all the firm, together with networks comparable to CNN and TNT, at a valuation of roughly $108 billion that contemplates assuming or addressing about $87 billion of WBD debt. Warner Bros. Discovery’s board has rejected that provide as insufficient and overly leveraged, arguing it’s not “even comparable” to the Netflix proposal.
Netflix, against this, has agreed to purchase WBD’s movie and tv studios, HBO and HBO Max in a money‑and‑inventory deal valued at $27.75 per WBD share, implying about $72 billion in fairness worth and $82.7 billion in enterprise worth, whereas leaving the legacy cable networks behind as a stand‑alone public firm. Warner Bros. Discovery’s board has endorsed that transaction and urged shareholders to again it, positioning the Netflix tie‑up as a cleaner, decrease‑danger approach to reshape the corporate for the streaming period.
What the proxy struggle means for buyers
A proxy contest would give Paramount a chance to ask Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders to oust some or all incumbent administrators on the 2026 annual assembly and exchange them with nominees extra open to partaking on its provide. Paramount has mentioned these administrators, if elected, would “in accordance with their fiduciary duties” use WBD’s rights beneath the Netflix settlement to revisit its bid and doubtlessly steer the corporate right into a transaction with Paramount as an alternative.
If Warner Bros. Discovery convenes a shareholder vote on the Netflix deal earlier than that assembly, Paramount has pledged to solicit proxies in opposition to approving the settlement, successfully turning the vote into an early referendum on which transaction shareholders want. Governance and investor‑relations consultants say that dynamic shifts extra of the leverage from the boardroom to the shareholder base, notably if buyers view the selection as a commerce‑off between headline value and execution danger.
A Netflix spokesperson declined to remark when contacted by Fortune.
Authorized stress on disclosure
In its Delaware criticism and in Ellison’s letter to WBD buyers, Paramount contends that Warner Bros. Discovery has failed to offer the “customary” monetary disclosure anticipated when a board recommends a transaction or points a Schedule 14D‑9 response within the face of a competing tender provide. The go well with says WBD has not spelled out the way it valued the Netflix bundle versus the residual “stub” fairness within the spun‑off networks, or how the acquisition‑value changes for debt and different liabilities have an effect on the actual economics for shareholders.
Ellison argues that Delaware legislation requires boards to present shareholders sufficient info to make totally knowledgeable funding selections when they’re requested to tender shares or vote on a deal, and that WBD has fallen in need of that normal. Paramount is asking the court docket to compel Warner Bros. Discovery to fill in these gaps earlier than Netflix’s provide interval expires, which might give buyers a clearer foundation on which to match the rival transactions.
What’s subsequent
Warner Bros. Discovery has thus far stood by its endorsement of the Netflix transaction and has continued to reject Paramount’s advances, organising what might be a protracted struggle stretching from the courtroom to the annual assembly. Paramount, for its half, is signaling that it and the Ellison household are ready to remain within the struggle, betting that extra disclosure and mounting shareholder scrutiny will ultimately tilt the stability in favor of its all‑money bid.
