Matt Kalil is lastly breaking his silence after his ex-wife, Haley, shockingly claimed his penis measurement torpedoed their marriage … within the type of a lawsuit towards the influencer and mannequin.
TMZ Sports activities obtained the docs filed on Tuesday … during which the previous Carolina Panther says Haley’s “invasive commentary” ruined his try at preserving out of the general public eye after retiring from soccer.
Within the lawsuit, Kalil says all of it stems from Haley’s look on standard streamer Marlon Garcia‘s “Mar-Athon” video in November 2025. Within the clip, Kalil says Haley “implied that the dimensions of Plaintiff’s genitalia was a main issue within the events’ divorce and claimed that sexual activity with Plaintiff would depart her ‘in tears.'”
In that stream … she described it as “two coke cans, perhaps even a 3rd” and stated it contributed to them going their separate methods. As we beforehand reported, Haley filed for divorce in 2022.
Twitch/Getty
Matt claims that due to these remarks on the stream, he has been subjected to “undesirable consideration and invasive commentary from the general public.” On high of that … he claims his members of the family “have been pressured to endure the continued public circulation of those degrading and deeply private statements.”
On account of the viral clip, Kalil says his new spouse obtained messages that grew to become “more and more frequent, disturbing, and alarming in nature over time.”
Matt claims … whereas his household was left to cope with the crap storm Haley began … she has been capable of “financially profit from this surge in site visitors.”
The 36-year-old is suing for invasion of privateness, because it disclosed “extremely intimate and personal info relating to Plaintiff’s bodily individual and sexual life” … in addition to unjust enrichment, saying Haley “obtained substantial monetary profit, elevated viewership, elevated engagement, and monetization by way of numerous social media platforms and media protection.”
He is now requesting a jury trial and damages “on all causes asserted within the criticism,” with the quantity exceeding $75,000.
