By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Scoopico
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
Reading: Government workers can protest, with limits
Share
Font ResizerAa
ScoopicoScoopico
Search

Search

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel

Latest Stories

Inflation report expected to show prices eased before Iran war
Inflation report expected to show prices eased before Iran war
Why China Might Have a Role to Play in Iran – Foreign Policy
Why China Might Have a Role to Play in Iran – Foreign Policy
Why The Madison’s Matthew Fox Won’t Return for Season 2
Why The Madison’s Matthew Fox Won’t Return for Season 2
Ukraine sends drone experts to Gulf, viewing an ‘opportunity’
Ukraine sends drone experts to Gulf, viewing an ‘opportunity’
4 Takeaways from Italy’s Stunning World Baseball Classic Upset Over Team USA
4 Takeaways from Italy’s Stunning World Baseball Classic Upset Over Team USA
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved
Government workers can protest, with limits
Opinion

Government workers can protest, with limits

Scoopico
Last updated: March 1, 2026 8:34 am
Scoopico
Published: March 1, 2026
Share
SHARE



The Bill of Rights is essential to our way of life. It enshrines our God-given rights that our federal and state governments are meant to steward, ensuring that we, the people, can express ourselves freely without fear of government persecution.

That right is so important that the Framers made it the First Amendment to the Constitution.

While we all enjoy freedoms of speech, religion, press, assembly and petition, it is true that the First Amendment rights do have limits. Yelling “fire” in a crowded theater is a classic example of non-protected speech. When you are a government employee, your First Amendment rights are actually more limited than if you were a private citizen.

For example, individuals in the executive branch must limit their political activism while at work under the Hatch Act.

So, when federal and state government employees take actions to impede federal law enforcement or give the appearance of supporting such activities, it becomes a big deal.

Unfortunately, we’ve seen this play out amid the unrest in Minneapolis. In one example, an on-duty Postal Service worker flipped off and verbally accosted Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. Not only was this behavior unbecoming of a federal government representative, but it likely doesn’t qualify as protected speech for government employees.

State government employees also face the same restrictions, no matter their job. This is especially true for those working in state legal systems. Despite these restrictions, Jamael Lundy, the intergovernmental affairs director of the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office and a political candidate, stormed the Cities Church in St. Paul alongside an anti-ICE group to protest ICE activities.

Regardless of Lundy’s status as a political candidate, his being a public employee of a county attorney means he is held to the same First Amendment standards as his colleagues.

More than that, it calls into question the impartiality of the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office and raises many questions about accountability for him and individuals like him when they engage in such demonstrations. It also sends a bright flare to their constituents that Lundy and others prioritize their political ideologies over others’ constitutional rights.

Thankfully, Lundy and two other leaders of the anti-ICE group were arrested by and charged with conspiring and interfering with the worshippers’ First Amendment rights to worship.

For the country to succeed, government employees must recognize that, while they have First Amendment rights, playing politics with their official position (or just the appearance of it) is unacceptable. It leads to further distrust of law enforcement, public officials and our system of governance.

Americans have seen rioting before. They could rightly expect that the rioters weren’t being abetted by those who are supposed to be working for them.

Would that they still could.

Houston Keene is a director at Democracy Restored/InsideSources

Newsom exhibits lose companies and insult entrepreneurs
There are many therapists doing greater than ‘hand-holding’
Ending the filibuster would nonetheless be a nasty thought
Editorial: Harvard, MIT nonetheless embarrassing failures
Metropolis Corridor cannot afford to overlook one other safety lesson
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print

POPULAR

Inflation report expected to show prices eased before Iran war
U.S.

Inflation report expected to show prices eased before Iran war

Why China Might Have a Role to Play in Iran – Foreign Policy
Politics

Why China Might Have a Role to Play in Iran – Foreign Policy

Why The Madison’s Matthew Fox Won’t Return for Season 2
Entertainment

Why The Madison’s Matthew Fox Won’t Return for Season 2

Ukraine sends drone experts to Gulf, viewing an ‘opportunity’
News

Ukraine sends drone experts to Gulf, viewing an ‘opportunity’

4 Takeaways from Italy’s Stunning World Baseball Classic Upset Over Team USA
Sports

4 Takeaways from Italy’s Stunning World Baseball Classic Upset Over Team USA

Real Madrid vs. Man City 2026 livestream: Watch Champions League for free
Tech

Real Madrid vs. Man City 2026 livestream: Watch Champions League for free

Scoopico

Stay ahead with Scoopico — your source for breaking news, bold opinions, trending culture, and sharp reporting across politics, tech, entertainment, and more. No fluff. Just the scoop.

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?