By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Scoopico
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
Reading: Healey should reverse course on Web Zero by 2050
Share
Font ResizerAa
ScoopicoScoopico
Search

Search

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel

Latest Stories

Stefanik exits New York governor’s race after Trump stays impartial and worries flare a couple of bitter main
Stefanik exits New York governor’s race after Trump stays impartial and worries flare a couple of bitter main
DHS: 2.5 million unlawful immigrants left US below President Donald Trump
DHS: 2.5 million unlawful immigrants left US below President Donald Trump
Jake Paul Knocked Out By Anthony Joshua
Jake Paul Knocked Out By Anthony Joshua
Down Arrow Button Icon
Down Arrow Button Icon
Anthony Joshua knocks out Jake Paul within the sixth spherical
Anthony Joshua knocks out Jake Paul within the sixth spherical
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved
Healey should reverse course on Web Zero by 2050
Opinion

Healey should reverse course on Web Zero by 2050

Scoopico
Last updated: October 17, 2025 8:26 am
Scoopico
Published: October 17, 2025
Share
SHARE



The state’s far-reaching Web Zero by 2050 mandate has claimed its newest victims underneath the newly applied Giant Constructing Power Reporting (LBER) necessities.

LBER was quietly tucked into the notorious Web Zero by 2050 roadmap regulation signed in 2022. Like many components of that invoice, its impression is barely now turning into clear and the squeeze on employers is tightening as its implementation turns into actuality.

The brand new LBER guidelines require constructing homeowners with greater than 20,000 sq. ft of area to report their vitality utilization past what utilities already observe.

Within the spring of this 12 months, some property homeowners have been mailed an undated letter from Governor Healey’s Commissioner of the Division of Power Sources, Elizabeth Mahoney. The Commissioner’s letter instructed these property homeowners that they wanted to start to register their property with the state. The mandate requires electrical, fuel, and steam utilities to report information on behalf of coated buildings to the Massachusetts Division of Power Sources. It requires the homeowners or brokers of coated buildings to report utilization of further sources comparable to oil, propane, wooden, and on-site renewable vitality era.

Apart from additional burdening companies with extra paperwork and regulatory necessities, the query should be raised: if a enterprise is contemplating transferring to Massachusetts for whom vitality prices and utilization are an essential consideration, why transfer to Massachusetts when the state is signaling that massive authorities is watching?  Does our governor perceive that producers, and firms within the AI discipline, are keenly conscious of vitality prices, and this requirement sends a really damaging sign about potential rationing?

All this monitoring shouldn’t be for curiosity’s sake. It’s to construct the muse for future, costly, and restrictive emission-reduction mandates. In different phrases, the state is making these property homeowners, a lot of whom are additionally small companies, braid the rope they’ll be hung with.

Giant property homeowners already care about vitality effectivity as a result of vitality prices instantly have an effect on their backside line. They’ve a pure want to maintain these prices down and don’t want the governor to remind them that increased utilization means increased payments. However this new reporting regime isn’t about serving to companies, it’s about arming regulators with the info they’ll use to impose the following spherical of expensive mandates, and that has companies rightfully fearful. And who can blame them?

The message to any firm fascinated about increasing or relocating to Massachusetts couldn’t be clearer: prepare, you’re subsequent. The sensible selection for these potential companies is clearly to take their jobs and investments and go elsewhere.

This mandated “disclosure,” as it’s referred to on the mass.gov web site, is claimed to supply transparency for constructing stakeholders. That’s wealthy coming from a legislature that refuses to topic itself to a fundamental audit.

As responsible because the Legislature is for passing this mess of a regulation, Governor Healey nonetheless has a chance to proper the ship. She’s taken vital flack from offended ratepayers in current months and has even begun softening her rhetoric on vitality sources like nuclear. However she nonetheless hasn’t proven assist for the one coverage that may go furthest in the direction of reassuring enterprise and holding vitality affordability for residents; the Web Zero by 2050 mandate must be repealed and changed with a objective. If Massachusetts ever needs to be reasonably priced and aggressive once more, that’s the place reform should begin.

Till the mandate is modified right into a objective, it is going to proceed to set into movement a collection of painful and costly measures designed to alter habits in vitality utilization. The state goes to do that not by providing a carrot, as they did with their close to infinite subsidies for photo voltaic, warmth pumps, electrical autos and so on., however moderately with the stick. Simply as LBER is now starting to have an effect on massive constructing homeowners, “sensible meters” shall be used to maintain a grasp on residential vitality utilization and in-turn implement restrictive insurance policies. The tip outcome shall be a sort of carbon tax or vitality rationing, or each.

The one option to cease this cult-like insanity is to cease the NetZero by 2050 mandate. Targets are aspirational; mandates come at a value and that price is being born by price payers. The NetZero by 2050 mandate is twisting the wrist that’s turning the screw.
The governor must reverse course on this damaging reporting requirement. That letter must be adopted with a retraction. Finally, Governor Healey must undertake a smart vitality strategy, and it should be to reverse the NetZero by 2050 mandate or voters must elect somebody that can.

Paul D. Craney is the Govt Director of Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance

Sweeping reform wanted for assisted residing amenities after Fall River tragedy
Letters to the Editor: Educating studying at a younger age advantages baby and dad or mum alike
Letters to the Editor: Discounting the whole thing of the MAGA base will get us nowhere
Tech that replaces human employees may have critical adverse results
Dems win on Trump resistance, now comes the onerous half
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print

POPULAR

Stefanik exits New York governor’s race after Trump stays impartial and worries flare a couple of bitter main
U.S.

Stefanik exits New York governor’s race after Trump stays impartial and worries flare a couple of bitter main

DHS: 2.5 million unlawful immigrants left US below President Donald Trump
Politics

DHS: 2.5 million unlawful immigrants left US below President Donald Trump

Jake Paul Knocked Out By Anthony Joshua
Entertainment

Jake Paul Knocked Out By Anthony Joshua

Down Arrow Button Icon
Money

Down Arrow Button Icon

Anthony Joshua knocks out Jake Paul within the sixth spherical
News

Anthony Joshua knocks out Jake Paul within the sixth spherical

Pistons get transient respite at residence vs. Hornets
Sports

Pistons get transient respite at residence vs. Hornets

Scoopico

Stay ahead with Scoopico — your source for breaking news, bold opinions, trending culture, and sharp reporting across politics, tech, entertainment, and more. No fluff. Just the scoop.

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?