When the Home Oversight Committee launched a trove of information and emails from the Epstein property earlier this month, alleged victims of the convicted intercourse offender responded with “widespread panic” after studying the paperwork included dozens of unredacted sufferer names, outstanding attorneys for Epstein victims instructed a federal choose this week.
“I believed the federal government had promised to redact our names and figuring out materials. I do not perceive how that is taking place once more,” one alleged sufferer instructed attorneys Bradley Edwards and Brittany Henderson, with the Edwards Henderson regulation agency, in line with a court docket submitting Wednesday.
“This kind of negligence by the federal government to a survivor is simply unable to understand. It’s simply unimaginable,” one other alleged sufferer stated, in line with the submitting. “I do not perceive how that is doable.”
“I’ve been unable to mentally and emotionally perform or sleep,” one more alleged sufferer wrote, per the court docket submitting.
With the Justice Division now going through a Dec. 19 deadline to launch lots of of 1000’s of Epstein information, as required by the Epstein Recordsdata Transparency Act, the Edwards Henderson attorneys are calling on a federal choose to order the DOJ to enhance their assessment coverage to stop one other launch of doubtless delicate details about alleged victims.
Jeffrey Epstein in Cambridge, Ma., Sept. 8, 2004.
Rick Friedman/Corbis through Getty Pictures
“These girls usually are not political pawns. They’re moms, wives, and daughters. These are girls who have been abused by Jeffrey Epstein, and in some situations by others, and who’ve already had their rights violated up to now by the Authorities,” the attorneys wrote within the submitting to U.S. District Decide Richard Berman. “They’re human beings who’ve the appropriate to be handled with dignity and respect, and to really feel protected and guarded by our nation, which has failed them time and time once more.”
In line with the attorneys’ submitting, the Home Oversight launch included the unredacted names and private info of dozens of victims, together with girls who have been minors on the time of their abuse. One doc alone contained 28 unredacted names of alleged sufferer, the attorneys wrote. Based mostly on the scope of the difficulty, the attorneys stated that they imagine the DOJ both “doesn’t know the identities of all of the victims of Jeffrey Epstein and thus can’t apply correct redactions to the information,” or “is deliberately failing to guard victims from public publicity.”
“Whereas we are going to element the varied excuses that the Courtroom will little doubt be supplied, that is completely unacceptable and a program that should be rectified previous to the general public launch of any extra paperwork,” the Edwards Henderson attorneys wrote.
The submitting additional famous that the DOJ publicly acknowledged in July that “Epstein harmed over one thousand victims.” Based mostly on that assertion, the attorneys requested within the submitting that the court docket verify with the DOJ that, previous to submitting the information to the Home Oversight Committee, “it undertook the onerous and essential job of redacting all one thousand plus sufferer names that it had in its possession.”
“On that pointed inquiry, the court docket will be taught the DOJ’s redaction course of and its course of efforts are so irreconcilable with the variety of victims it has publicly acknowledged that, when confronted with the discrepancy, its response will land someplace between incoherent mumbling, non sequitur, and outright misrepresentation,” the attorneys wrote.
After months of anticipation, the Home of Representatives voted 427-1 to move a invoice ordering the discharge of the Justice Division’s information on late intercourse offender Jeffrey Epstein in Washington, Nov. 18, 2025.
Home of Representatives
The attorneys additionally alleged within the submitting that victims have been unable to contact the Division of Justice to stop the identical factor from taking place once more.
“Regardless of quite a few pleas for help, there’s one singular entity that the victims can’t appear to discover a method to have interaction and which has been the first violator of the victims’ identification safety up to now — the Division of Justice,” they wrote.
With the DOJ already possessing lots of of 1000’s of Epstein paperwork, the attorneys additionally solid doubt concerning the Trump administration’s intention in looking for out separate grand jury materials.
The DOJ has requested judges in New York and Florida to authorize the discharge of grand jury transcripts and reveals from the prosecutions of Epstein and Maxwell — info that’s usually not made public. Earlier than the passage of the Epstein Recordsdata Transparency Act, the DOJ made comparable requests that have been denied by judges.
“[T]his extremely small, and largely irrelevant, subset of grand jury supplies [seems] to function nothing greater than DOJ’s perpetual distraction from offering the American folks with full transparency because it pertains to Jeffrey Epstein, whereas defending the victims,” the submitting states.
Rep. Thomas Massie speaks alongside Rep. Ro Khanna and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene throughout a information convention on the Epstein Recordsdata Transparency Act outdoors the U.S. Capitol, November 18, 2025 in Washington.
Heather Diehl/Getty Pictures
The Edwards Henderson attorneys requested Decide Berman to order the Division of Justice to make clear what paperwork they plan to launch and the method for redacting them. He additionally requested the power to check with the DOJ to make sure that a whole record of victims’ names is used within the redaction course of.
Decide Berman responded to the letter Wednesday by ordering the Division of Justice, by midday Monday, Dec. 1, to offer a “detailed description” of the supplies they search to launch and a “detailed description of the privateness course of, together with any redactions, the Authorities seeks to make use of to guard the rights of Epstein victims.”
In a separate submitting Wednesday, U.S. Legal professional Jay Clayton stated his workplace would “check with counsel for recognized victims regarding names and phrases for withholding and redactions.”
Clayton additionally clarified the breadth of the paperwork the Division of Justice seeks to launch, together with notes from witness interviews, search warrant purposes, monetary and journey data, grand jury subpoena returns, college data, supplies from the Epstein property, and regulation enforcement data.
