By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Scoopico
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
Reading: Deposit insurance coverage for billionaires? No thanks
Share
Font ResizerAa
ScoopicoScoopico
Search

Search

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel

Latest Stories

Blue Jackets breeze regardless of five hundredth aim from Leafs’ John Tavares
Blue Jackets breeze regardless of five hundredth aim from Leafs’ John Tavares
Moon section right now defined: What the moon will seem like on October 30, 2025
Moon section right now defined: What the moon will seem like on October 30, 2025
‘Sunburned Sisters’ Communicate Out After Airport Arrest
‘Sunburned Sisters’ Communicate Out After Airport Arrest
Vance says Christian values key to nation’s future, slams liberalism at TPUSA occasion
Vance says Christian values key to nation’s future, slams liberalism at TPUSA occasion
Days of Our Lives Early Spoilers Nov 3-7: Chanel’s Devastating Heartbreak & JJ’s Menacing Ultimatum
Days of Our Lives Early Spoilers Nov 3-7: Chanel’s Devastating Heartbreak & JJ’s Menacing Ultimatum
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved
Deposit insurance coverage for billionaires? No thanks
Opinion

Deposit insurance coverage for billionaires? No thanks

Scoopico
Last updated: October 29, 2025 1:34 pm
Scoopico
Published: October 29, 2025
Share
SHARE



Politicians in Washington have the shortest recollections.

Perhaps that’s why they so seldom study from their generally catastrophic errors.

It was lower than 20 years in the past that the U.S. economic system was flattened by the mortgage and banking disaster.

The specialists mentioned that the percentages had been tiny that the housing market might crash; that the federal housing businesses Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would by no means want a bailout; that mortgage-backed securities had been nearly as good as gold.

Then they crashed in a single day spectacularly and devastatingly. Banks made riskier and riskier housing loans to subprime debtors — and the federal government coated the bets with basically 100% mortgage ensures.

One purpose depositors and buyers had been paying no consideration to the massive banks’ high-risk lending technique is that every thing was assured.

By you and me.

Proper now, accounts are insured as much as $250,000, so most Individuals don’t have to fret in regards to the soundness of the financial institution the place they retailer their hard-earned financial savings. We don’t need 1929-style financial institution runs, for positive. So this security web, there for shock-absorbing systemic dangers, is smart for mom-and-pop savers and buyers.

However now there’s a proposal to lift that taxpayer-insured restrict to — drum roll, please — $10 million.

What number of Individuals have $10 million to deposit within the financial institution? Nicely, let’s see: There’s Invoice Gates, Elon Musk and Taylor Swift, to call a couple of within the billionaire class.

Supporters in each events declare it will enable smaller neighborhood banks to extra simply elevate capital for lending and compete with the “Large 5” banks. That’s an excellent aim.

However we actually ought to name this newest proposal “the Billionaire Insurance coverage Act.”

A latest examine from the Cato Institute discovered that fewer than 1% of deposit accounts exceed $250,000, the extent at which Federal Deposit Insurance coverage Company protection presently ends. So to extend that quantity to $10 million will imply taxpayer-supported insurance coverage for the deposits of not the highest 1% however the prime 0.01% of Individuals.

However who might be watching over the banks? It’s one factor to have the proverbial fox watching the henhouse, however with these sorts of limits, NO ONE is watching besides the federal regulators who had been asleep on the change in 2006, ’07 and ’08.

There may be one more reason why lifting the deposit insurance coverage limits is foolhardy. We don’t wish to encourage buyers to hunt secure harbor in risk-free investments. The millionaires and the billionaires are the individuals we DO wish to take dangers with their fortunes. We wish them to find and seed-invest within the subsequent Microsoft or Google or Walmart.

Danger-taking is a advantage — it’s what constructed this nation.

However we wish buyers to make the massive bets with their very own cash, not yours and mine.

Stephen Moore is a former Trump senior financial adviser and the cofounder of Unleash Prosperity, which advocates for schooling freedom for all youngsters.

Contributor: L.A.’s fires report exposes America’s damaged alert system
Did Kamala Harris simply destroy her 2028 possibilities?
Letters to the Editor: How is ‘Medicare for all’ ‘unworkable’ when common healthcare works elsewhere?
Opinion | ‘If You Don’t Need This Consequence, Don’t Vote for Republicans’
As Disneyland turns 70, readers share their reminiscences of visiting
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print

POPULAR

Blue Jackets breeze regardless of five hundredth aim from Leafs’ John Tavares
Sports

Blue Jackets breeze regardless of five hundredth aim from Leafs’ John Tavares

Moon section right now defined: What the moon will seem like on October 30, 2025
Tech

Moon section right now defined: What the moon will seem like on October 30, 2025

‘Sunburned Sisters’ Communicate Out After Airport Arrest
U.S.

‘Sunburned Sisters’ Communicate Out After Airport Arrest

Vance says Christian values key to nation’s future, slams liberalism at TPUSA occasion
Politics

Vance says Christian values key to nation’s future, slams liberalism at TPUSA occasion

Days of Our Lives Early Spoilers Nov 3-7: Chanel’s Devastating Heartbreak & JJ’s Menacing Ultimatum
Entertainment

Days of Our Lives Early Spoilers Nov 3-7: Chanel’s Devastating Heartbreak & JJ’s Menacing Ultimatum

MUC CEF: Could Solely Be Appropriate For The Highest-Revenue California Taxpayers (NYSE:MUC)
Money

MUC CEF: Could Solely Be Appropriate For The Highest-Revenue California Taxpayers (NYSE:MUC)

Scoopico

Stay ahead with Scoopico — your source for breaking news, bold opinions, trending culture, and sharp reporting across politics, tech, entertainment, and more. No fluff. Just the scoop.

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?