Diddy’s Legal professionals Declare Voyeurism Would not Rely as Prostitution

Diddy‘s listening to on his movement to get the Mann Act costs thrown out began simply a short while in the past … and, his attorneys are taking their argument from authorized motions to actual life — firing off in a New York Metropolis courtroom.

The rapper’s authorized staff — led by Marc Agnifilo — kicked off their argument by repeating to the choose what they beforehand said in authorized papers … prostitution means one particular person paying to have intercourse with one other particular person. They insist it would not discuss with somebody who pays to observe two individuals have intercourse, like Diddy did.

Nonetheless, prosecutors responded by declaring Diddy wasn’t simply going someplace and sitting in a sales space to observe two individuals get it on … they are saying he reimbursed his ex-girlfriends for arranging the sexual encounters and derived sexual gratification himself from watching.

Prosecutors additionally add the costs cannot come all the way down to a free speech concern — in a pornography sense — as a result of not each sexual encounter was filmed.

Diddy’s attorneys fired again by arguing it was filmed more often than not. Additionally they say Diddy was engaged in novice pornography, which they are saying is not against the law.

Diddy’s staff attacked the inspiration of the Mann Act too … calling it an previous, racist legislation judges have expressed outrage about during the last 100 years.

As … Diddy’s attorneys, his household and prosecutors all rolled as much as the courtroom shortly earlier than the listening to to seek out out if the two Mann Act convictions can be tossed or if he’ll get one other trial on them.