![90 Day Fiance: Jasmine Pineda Delivers Drama and a Child Woman – Fortunately Ever After Recap [S09E17]](https://i1.wp.com/eadn-wc01-4272485.nxedge.io/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/90-day-fiance-jasmine-pineda-2378.jpg?w=150&resize=150,150&ssl=1 "90 Day Fiance: Jasmine Pineda Delivers Drama and a Child Woman – Fortunately Ever After Recap [S09E17]")
Fired MSNBC Analyst
Michael Dowd Calls Out Community …
After Charlie Kirk Fiasco
Printed
The previous MSNBC analyst fired over his controversial Charlie Kirk feedback is blaming the right-wing “mob” for his termination whereas additionally taking a jab at his ex-employer.
Matthew Dowd wrote on his Substack Friday that the “Proper Wing media mob ginned up” concerning the phrases he expressed about Kirk on MSNBC and attacked him on numerous platforms.
Dowd says MSNBC “reacted to that mob” and fired him regardless of his statements being misconstrued and the general public apology he made for any miscommunication.
The political pundit additionally went into element about what occurred Wednesday when he was a visitor on “Katy Tur Studies.”
9/10/25
Jeremy King through Storyful
Dowd says he was invited on the present to debate a bunch of matters when information broke about gunfire erupting at Kirk’s occasion at Utah Valley College in Orem, UT.
He says Tur requested him to touch upon the “nationwide atmosphere” during which such shootings happen, when there was no inkling but that Kirk had even been shot.
TMZ.com
Dowd claims all he mentioned was we have to get the details, and the incident “might simply be somebody firing a gun within the air to rejoice Kirk’s occasion.” He added, “Keep in mind, Kirk is a diehard advocate of the 2nd modification.”
What’s extra, Dowd admits he was naive in pondering anybody would disagree with him … saying his now “legendary line” on Tur‘s present about Kirk’s rhetoric is, “Hateful ideas result in hateful phrases which finally result in hateful actions.”
Earlier than Dowd was canned, MSNBC President Rebecca Kutler apologized for Dowd’s remarks, calling them “inappropriate, insensitive and unacceptable.”
