Shark CryoGlow vs. CurrentBody masks: It is not even a contest

Bendable pink gentle remedy masks walked in order that the laborious shell masks may run. Although I can not shut up about how a lot I beloved my expertise with the Shark CryoGlow regardless of its cumbersome, not-bendy-at-all building, it felt essential to return to the roots of pink gentle and check out one of many OGs: The CurrentBody masks. In any case, that one and the OmniLux masks have been making its rounds on my TikTok FYP far earlier than the Shark masks ever did.

As a skincare fanatic whose fundamental concern at 31 shouldn’t be solely high quality strains, however zits that’s 100 instances worse at 31 than it ever was at 13, it did not take lengthy for me to wonder if pink gentle masks actually work or not. I am down for Botox or microneedling right here and there, however they’re each costly habits to remain on prime of — so I made a decision to see how far I may stretch these in-office periods by relying solely on every day LED masks utilization. I used the Shark CryoGlow masks and CurrentBody masks in separate intervals of at the very least eight weeks every.

I had an general smoother every day expertise with one of many masks, and my pores and skin made it fairly obvious which masks it wanted as a staple in my routine. Listed below are my ideas on whether or not you can purchase the Shark CryoGlow or CurrentBody LED masks, primarily based by myself journey and outcomes.

Notice: This overview particularly options the CurrentBody Pores and skin: Sequence 2 masks.

Shark CryoGlow vs. CurrentBody: Bulbs and nanometer measurement

After listening to that the CurrentBody Pores and skin masks is dearer than the Shark CryoGlow masks (by greater than $100), you’d naturally assume that the CurrentBody is extra highly effective. However you would be off.

Whereas the CurrentBody masks does have extra LED bulbs on paper (237 versus the Shark’s 160), not one of the bulbs within the CurrentBody Pores and skin masks are blue gentle bulbs. They’re pink and close to infrared solely, and never each bulb within the CurrentBody masks can emit each pink and NIR (close to infrared) gentle. There are 110 pink gentle bulbs (633nm) and 110 NIR bulbs (830nm), plus 16 deep NIR bulbs (1,072nm) across the eyes and mouth for further high quality line consideration. An improve from the unique model of the CurrentBody masks, the Sequence 2 has an added chin strap to increase protection to the jawline and perhaps a tiny little bit of the higher neck.

In the meantime, the Shark masks has pink (630nm), close to infrared (830nm), and blue gentle bulbs (415nm), and each single bulb can emit any of these wavelengths on the identical time. That technically totals 480 simultaneous gentle sources contained in the Shark masks, guaranteeing that extra of your face is being hit by any of the wavelengths. The nm (nanometer) quantity is a unit of measurement for every wavelength. Each masks hit the usual pink gentle and NIR nanometer measurement typically thought-about “robust” sufficient to provide any kind of at-home outcomes. The Shark CryoGlow masks does not do deep close to infrared in any respect, however do not forget that the CurrentBody solely has 16 of these.

So as to add blue gentle to your current CurrentBody routine, you’d have to purchase the $469.99 Anti-Pimples masks individually. That is almost $1,000 in comparison with the CryoGlow’s $349.99 price ticket. So, there’s that.

In additional scientific phrases, pink gentle masks are sometimes given an irradiance measurement, or a measurement of energy density on the supply of the LED. The entire tri-wick bulbs packed into the CryoGlow convey it to a most irradiance of 128mW/cm², whereas the CurrentBody masks maxes out at 30mW/cm² of the Omnilux.

There may be one space of the face the place the CurrentBody’s protection dominates: the below eyes. The CryoGlow masks does not have any LEDs below the attention holes, as an alternative utilizing the area for cooling pads that mimic a cryotherapy de-puffing impact. They do really feel wonderful if you’re half awake within the morning, however the outcomes solely final for a couple of minutes. The under-eyes are universally probably the most cussed spots to deal with with over-the-counter skincare, so an at-home pink gentle masks may very properly be somebody’s last-ditch effort earlier than paying for a legit process. So whereas the CurrentBody would possibly converse to you extra in case your fundamental skincare aim is long-term discount of darkish circles or eye baggage, I feel the Shark’s blue gentle choice and tri-wick bulb state of affairs will get extra in your cash general.

Winner: Shark

Shark CryoGlow vs. CurrentBody: Settings and distant

That is the place Shark actually begins to drag forward of CurrentBody. If you happen to’re dually involved about high quality strains and texture in addition to zits, the CryoGlow is overwhelmingly the higher masks.

Each masks have remotes which might be hooked up to the masks by way of a wire. Nonetheless, I am not precisely certain why CurrentBody did not simply go wi-fi and transfer the distant’s lone “on” button to the masks itself. It is not just like the masks can do the rest however merely be on — there’s only a single fastened pink gentle and infrared setting. I perceive that that is most likely within the identify of simplicity, but it surely’s painfully fundamental to me.

It virtually feels unfair to match it to the Shark CryoGlow distant, which encompasses a small LCD display and a wheel to regulate cooling pad temperature and pan between three modes: Higher Growing older (pink and infrared gentle), Blemish Restore (all three wavelengths in various combos), and Pores and skin Maintain (all three wavelengths on the identical time). As soon as you’ve got chosen a setting, the display counts down how a lot time you’ve gotten left in your session.

That lineup goes to be rather more palatable to anybody who has multiple skincare concern. Personally, I desperately wished to attempt an at-home LED masks for its potential mitigation of the zits that simply randomly began exhibiting up in my late 20s — however my late 20s additionally introduced alongside the onset of high quality brow and smile strains, and I additionally wished my make-up to cease caking in these. The Shark masks has a solution for each of these, and I like that the distant offers me the liberty to let me select what I need to goal on any given day. The CurrentBody’s lack of customization is genuinely form of stunning for the worth, and felt like a downgrade after such a premium expertise with the Shark for a number of months earlier than it.

Shark’s settings additionally take barely much less time than CurrentBody’s: The three Shark settings take 4, six, or eight minutes, whereas the one CurrentBody setting takes 10 minutes. It is not an enormous distinction by way of the duties you can get achieved throughout Masks Time, however once more, it is nonetheless good to have the ability to gauge what number of minutes are left. And whereas the CryoGlow’s battery life is far shorter, you’ll be able to at the very least gauge the timing earlier than your subsequent cost with the battery icon on the display. When the CurrentBody masks is lifeless, it merely will not activate.

Winner: Shark

Shark CryoGlow vs. CurrentBody: Design and every day wearability

From the surface, it is only a given that you’re going to look ridiculous whereas sporting any pink gentle masks. The Shark CryoGlow is giving Jason Voorhees, whereas the CurrentBody Pores and skin is extra so embodying Dwight Schrute when he cuts the face off of a CPR dummy. I do not thoughts wanting humorous both approach so long as a masks is bodily snug to put on. FWIW, neither masks is unbearably heavy in any respect. The Shark CryoGlow is a little bit heavier — a bit over a pound, in comparison with the CurrentBody at lower than a pound.

Each masks have adjustable straps, however the Shark masks’s sliding adjusters (just like the again of a baseball cap) are a way more seamless course of. CurrentBody has approach too many intersections of velcro, together with The Huge Strap that must be achieved and undone on the again of your head every time you put on it. It is simply begging to get caught in your hair, and it made me miss the simplicity of slipping the CryoGlow on and off.

The presence of a shirt/pants clip on each remotes implies that it is best to be capable of roam the home whereas sporting the masks hands-free. Proper? When you clearly cannot anticipate to see completely out of any LED masks, I discover the Shark CryoGlow to be a lot simpler to put on than the CurrentBody Pores and skin. When the lights are on, the CurrentBody masks is simply… a lot extra in your face when it is in your face. The lights across the eyes are borderline blinding, a lot in order that something you’ll be able to see outdoors of the pink glowy haze is tinted blue.

To be truthful, the CryoGlow masks is not unnoticeable whereas it is on, both. The shell is so thick that I’ve to carry my palms out annoyingly far in entrance of me to see what I am doing. However I can nonetheless considerably get stuff achieved whereas sporting the CryoGlow, like feed the cats or make my mattress, whereas the CurrentBody Pores and skin feels too trippy to do something however sit on my telephone. If you do not have a squirrel mind like I do, it’s possible you’ll not thoughts having to zone out for a second — a CurrentBody masks proprietor on Reddit truly talked about that they respect being compelled to lie down for 10 minutes a day.

The inside of the masks are additionally barely completely different supplies. The within of the Shark is your basic slippery plastic that may be wiped down tremendous simply for sanitation functions. The within of the CurrentBody masks, which touches your face instantly, has a stickier silicone-y materials that weirds me out. A ton of cat hair and fuzzies get caught to it, too.

Winner: Shark

Shark CryoGlow vs. CurrentBody: Outcomes

In my expertise, the Shark CryoGlow masks works significantly better than the CurrentBody masks.

I bought my pores and skin into fairly wonderful form after about three months of every day CryoGlow utilization. Earlier than that, I used to be struggling laborious to get my zits below management — it felt like a brand new pimple was popping up each single day. After I was constantly switching between the Shark masks’s zits setting and “Higher Growing older” setting, I used to be going at the very least every week and not using a new pimple popping up.

After I switched to testing the CurrentBody Pores and skin masks, I clearly needed to put the CryoGlow on pause to isolate the CurrentBody outcomes. The CryoGlow masks works so properly on zits that I used to be terrified to surrender that blue gentle setting — and my worry got here true.

Throughout my CurrentBody Pores and skin testing interval, it felt like I misplaced a number of the skin-clearing progress I made. Take my CryoGlow “after” photograph from the fitting above and use it as my CurrentBody “earlier than” photograph. Beneath is the present standing of my chin after two months of strict CurrentBody masks utilization. I’ve one whitehead that is determined to pop, plus pink spots from recently-healed zits.

My pores and skin was significantly extra unpredictable after I was utilizing the CurrentBody than it was with the Shark masks, with recent pimples constantly establishing camp on my chin and cheeks a number of instances per week. Granted, that is nonetheless much less erratic than my zits cycle earlier than testing both of the masks.

Because the CurrentBody Pores and skin does not have blue gentle, I knew it wasn’t going to kill pore-clogging micro organism just like the CryoGlow can. However pink gentle can nonetheless be on the protection in opposition to zits — it is stated to advertise the regeneration of pores and skin cells, help with irritation, and perhaps even assist to stop scarring from present zits. I am tremendous susceptible to post-inflammatory erythema (pink spots that keep behind the place a pimple was once) that lasts for months, and I do not even really feel just like the CurrentBody did a lot to fade or stop that.

It is not that I feel the CurrentBody Pores and skin masks did completely nothing. My pores and skin held up a constant glow and smooth-enough texture to exit bare-faced throughout my time with the CurrentBody, although the high quality strains on my brow and round my eyes are undoubtedly nonetheless current. I have not gotten Botox in my brow for months, and I hoped the CurrentBody would make me need to maintain off on making a touch-up appointment (it did not). And given how stark different folks’s CurrentBody outcomes appear to be on social media, I anticipated my pores and skin to even out rather more than it did.

Winner: Shark

Shark CryoGlow vs. CurrentBody: Portability and packability

I am terrified to go every week with out the CryoGlow’s zits setting. That is a testomony to how reliably it prevents deep pimples from popping up on my face, but in addition a reminder of how deeply unlucky it’s that the CryoGlow could be ridiculously inconvenient to journey with.

It is not that the Shark masks weighs that a lot, but it surely’s a giant, cumbersome hunk of plastic that does not bend in any respect. It’d simply take up an ungainly quantity of area in a suitcase, particularly when you’re a heavy packer and really want to consolidate for a aircraft trip. The Currentbody’s construct is not almost as unforgiving. It is bodily thinner and versatile sufficient to be packed in with garments with out hogging a ton of cargo area. At any charge, each do include a drawstring journey or storage pouch.

The CryoGlow’s brief battery life would additionally make it annoying to tackle a visit. It must be charged each few days when you use it every day, whereas the CurrentBody masks’s battery life barely even must be charged as soon as per week.

Winner: CurrentBody

Shark CryoGlow vs. CurrentBody: Our winner

The Shark CryoGlow masks is irrefutably a extra well-rounded LED masks than the CurrentBody masks, in addition to a greater worth price-wise. Primarily based on how simple it has been to include the masks into my every day routine and the outcomes I’ve grown to anticipate from every, I genuinely stay up for sporting the Shark — whereas sporting the CurrentBody generally looks like a chore.

Regardless of being the extra compact masks, the CurrentBody Pores and skin is extra cumbersome to put on. The pink lights glow so uncomfortably brilliant close to your eyes that it is laborious to see a lot of something whereas sporting it.

The CurrentBody Pores and skin’s lack of adjustable settings simply feels so fundamental in comparison with the customization made doable by the CryoGlow distant’s intuitive LCD display. I am certain I am not the one 30-something individual on the market who’s coping with age-related high quality strains and grownup zits — and between these two masks, the Shark CryoGlow is the one one with devoted pink gentle, blue gentle, and close to infrared combos to focus on a number of pores and skin considerations. The CurrentBody might enchantment to you extra in case your sole aim is anti-aging across the eyes, however once more, my below eye and crows toes outcomes have been barely noticeable. I am telling somebody to decide on the Shark CryoGlow masks each time.