![Past the Gates: Who’s Hayley’s Thriller Associate? Might It Be [SPOILER]?](https://i2.wp.com/eadn-wc01-4272485.nxedge.io/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/BTG-Who-is-Hayley-Secret-Partner-Is-It-SPOILER.jpg?w=150&resize=150,150&ssl=1 "Past the Gates: Who’s Hayley’s Thriller Associate? Might It Be [SPOILER]?")
4 former Intel board members are backing President Donald Trump’s shock assault on the corporate’s CEO, however they’re pushing for a shake-up that’s each extra dramatic and wholly in step with their vocal criticism of late.
In a uncommon collective assertion offered completely to Fortune, the previous administrators mentioned the destiny of CEO Lip-Bu Tan must be determined by Intel shareholders and Intel’s board, however referred to as for a radical restructuring that will spin off Intel’s manufacturing arm into an unbiased firm to safe America’s chipmaking dominance.
The group of former Intel board members— Charlene Barshefsky, Reed Hundt, James Plummer, and David Yoffie—identified that the corporate is on its fourth CEO in seven years with little enchancment in outcomes. They argued that solely a dramatic break may restore Intel’s competitiveness and shield U.S. nationwide safety pursuits, with a rescue plan targeted particularly on emancipating Intel’s “Foundry” enterprise, the manufacturing belongings from which Intel produces semiconductor chips for its personal merchandise and for third-party clients. These superior chip fabrication services are more and more prime of thoughts for President Donald Trump, his Chinese language counterpart Xi Jinping, and your entire tech trade watching because the drama unfolds.
Intel was lengthy the chief in chips however has fallen behind Nvidia, TSMC and different gamers in recent times, as Barshefsky, Hundt, Plummer, and Yoffie argued within the pages of Fortune. Intel has two important companies, one being the Foundry and the opposite being referred to as merely Intel Merchandise, which incorporates its flagship PC and server microprocessors, in addition to networking gear and software program. Each are important for computing, however solely the Foundry is essential to nationwide safety, which has been a key level in commerce talks between Trump and Xi. The previous administrators group argued that splitting the chips manufacturing entity from the remainder of Intel would immediately handle each market competitiveness and the nation’s strategic want for superior semiconductors.
The group referred to as for Intel shareholders to insist on the break up, which might create a brand new, unbiased manufacturing entity, with its personal CEO and board. To make the brand new manufacturing firm aggressive with TSMC, the previous administrators referred to as for remaining funds below the CHIPS Act to go in direction of supporting the corporate and to assist “persuade American design corporations to put orders.” That will place the brand new firm to have the ability to to supply a substitute for TSMC, “each for innovative chips wanted for knowledge heart and different industrial functions and for nationwide safety necessities.”
Mounting strain
The assertion comes as strain on Intel intensifies, after President Donald Trump publicly referred to as for CEO Lip-Bu Tan’s resignation over his “conflicted” standing and alleged ties to Chinese language expertise corporations. Trump’s demand, posted on Fact Social Thursday morning, despatched shockwaves via U.S. tech circles and drew swift responses from the corporate.
Tan responded in a letter to workers, posted publicly on Intel’s web site, claiming there was “misinformation” about his profession and his previous management roles. The embattled CEO mentioned that Intel is “participating” with the Trump White Home to “handle the issues which have been raised and guarantee they’ve the info.” He added that he totally shares the president’s dedication to advancing U.S. nationwide and financial safety.
President Trump’s intervention adopted Senator Tom Cotton’s warnings over studies of Tan’s prior investments in Chinese language corporations, some allegedly tied to China’s navy. Trump’s demand for a right away CEO change provoked a 3% drop in Intel’s inventory Thursday, compounding board-level discord and market considerations concerning the firm’s stagnation and lack of floor to rivals equivalent to Nvidia and AMD.
In his be aware to workers on Thursday, Tan defended his integrity and claimed the present board was “totally supportive” of the work at the moment below method at Intel, whereas insisting that all through his 4 many years within the trade, he has “all the time operated throughout the highest authorized and moral requirements.”
Intel didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
In a earlier assertion to Fortune, nonetheless, the corporate pushed again on criticism, saying its board and CEO Lip-Bu Tan are “deeply dedicated to advancing U.S. nationwide and financial safety pursuits” and have been making “important investments aligned with the President’s America First agenda.”
Intel famous it has been manufacturing within the U.S. for 56 years and is investing billions of {dollars} in home semiconductor R&D and manufacturing, together with a brand new Arizona fab that may run probably the most superior course of expertise within the nation. The corporate added that it was “the one firm investing in main logic course of node improvement within the U.S.” and mentioned it regarded ahead to “continued engagement with the Administration.”
Correction: A earlier model of this story incorrectly acknowledged that the 4 former administrators referred to as for the ouster of Intel’s CEO. The group of former administrators mentioned that Intel shareholders ought to make the choice concerning the CEO.
