In a brazen transfer, Republicans in Texas have got down to redraw the state’s congressional map — an effort to spice up President Trump and the GOP within the 2026 midterm elections.
Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to reply in variety, gerrymandering blue California to present Democrats a carry and offset the Lone Star lunge for energy.
That might imply scrapping the political strains drawn by an unbiased residents fee, which voters created practically twenty years in the past to take line-drawing away from the state’s politicians.
Our columnists Mark Z. Barabak and Anita Chabria disagree strongly, however amicably, on the knowledge and implications of Newsom’s threatened transfer. Right here they hash it out.
Barabak: Gavin Newsom — or the forty eighth president of the USA, as he fancies himself — is maybe second solely to Donald Trump relating to browsing a political wave. And so it’s with redistricting and retribution.
It might set partisan Democratic hearts to racing — which is a part of Newsom’s intent — but it surely’s a foul transfer for all types of causes. Not least, ignoring the desire of California voters, who resoundingly informed the state’s self-dealing politicians no mas!
I perceive the fight-fire-with-fire perspective that animates partisan assist for the get-even speak by 48, er, Newsom. However the hazard is inflicting much more widespread harm.
Over time, a whole lot of zeitgeist-y strikes by the headline-hungry Newsom have come to naught. That is one other that belongs on the scrap heap.
Chabria: I agree that the Vegas odds are on the aspect of this tit-for-tat being nothing greater than a partisan headline-grabber.
However.
There’s a bigger and extra essential query right here that boils right down to how severely you consider our democracy is in jeopardy.
If, Mark — as I feel you’re inclined to a minimum of hope — this too shall move and our subsequent election shall be free and honest, nevertheless it might land, then the thought of gerrymandering our congressional districts will be nothing however appalling. That is very true in California, one of many few states wherein the individuals have voted to make sure our electoral maps are drawn with nonpartisan equity in thoughts.
If, like me, nevertheless, you assume we’re on a knife’s fringe of dropping our democracy to authoritarianism — or a minimum of an oligarchy the place hate is wielded for energy — then gerrymandering turns into a type of peaceable resistance.
Newsom lately stated, “We are able to act holier-than-thou. We are able to sit on the sidelines, discuss the way in which the world must be, or we are able to acknowledge the existential nature that’s this second” — which supplies you an thought of his pondering, and albeit, mine.
I’ll dive into that extra, however possibly that’s the place we begin. Do you assume our democracy is sound and what we’re witnessing is only a interval of discontent that may move with out lasting hurt?
Barabak: I positive hope so.
I yield to nobody in my disgust with Trump and concern about what he’s doing. He’s authoritarian. Autocratic. Smug. Anti-democratic. And that’s not even getting previous the letter “A.”
However actions just like the one Newsom threatens on redistricting don’t happen in a vacuum, which is essential to remember. Brief-term tactical good points may end up in long-term ache.
As an example: In 2013 Democrats had been so upset about Republican blockading of President Obama’s judicial and govt department nominations that Senate Majority Chief Harry Reid invoked the “nuclear possibility.” At Reid’s behest, the Senate narrowly voted to vary its guidelines and disallow the filibustering of presidential nominees.
The result’s Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth, Well being and Human Providers Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and an entire clown automotive of Trump Cupboard members.
And whereas Democrats explicitly stated the rule change wouldn’t apply to the Supreme Courtroom, as soon as the door was open Republicans shouldered their manner by way of and eradicated the filibuster for these nominees as nicely. The result’s Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and the excessive courtroom’s 6-3 Trump-coddling conservative super-majority.
Those that struggle fireplace with fireplace threat getting badly burned.
If Democrats need a struggle over redistricting, Republicans have much more methods to gerrymander and doubtlessly acquire seats — in locations comparable to Florida, Missouri and Ohio — than Democrats.
Chabria: Little doubt. However, and that is as little as it will get, I’ll pay the value of a Hegseth, possibly even two, if it actually does save democracy. Right here’s the truth: The one hope of a Congress that may curb Trump by way of the democratic course of is shifting a minimum of some energy to Democrats within the 2026 election.
If Texas Republicans, beneath strain from Trump, handle to redraw as many as 5 new GOP-leaning seats — and it doesn’t blow up of their faces, which it might — the transfer would enhance the possibilities the Home stays a Trump entourage and the prospect of authoritarianism goes from brush fireplace to wildfire.
The reality is that gerrymandering is way extra widespread than most notice. Kevin Johnson, an professional with the Election Reformers Community, wrote lately that “Within the Nineteen Nineties, solely 40% of the seats within the Home of Representatives had been thought-about a positive factor for one social gathering or the opposite, now that determine is 83%.” That’s as a result of most states gerrymander.
Actually, the one really aggressive races happen in states comparable to California which have unbiased, nonpartisan people drawing the election maps. So to play satan’s advocate, we’ve already misplaced to gerrymandering within the U.S. and California simply doesn’t comprehend it.
That’s an issue that might be solved if a future president and Congress needed to take action. But it surely requires attending to a future president and Congress. I at all times put this on the file: I care neither about Republicans or Democrats. I care about democracy.
If California gerrymandered, helped flip Congress into an actual examine in opposition to authoritarianism and left fixing gerrymandering for later, would it not actually be so dangerous?
Barabak: Your crystal ball should be much less hazy than mine.
I’m not all satisfied that even a acquire of 5 Texas Home seats would assure GOP management of the Home. (And let me put this on the file: I feel what Trump and his Texas handmaidens are doing is totally reprehensible.)
Since World Struggle II, the out-party has picked up a median of greater than two dozen Home seats in midterm elections. Democrats want a acquire of three to grab management.
There’s even, as you recommend, an opportunity Republicans’ political pigginess backfires by spreading their voters too skinny, creating districts that Democrats may decide up if there’s a large enough blue wave.
Talking of strikes backfiring, it’s no positive wager Californians would approve Newsom’s gerrymander effort if he put it to a vote in a particular election to override the fee.
Surrendering energy to politicians is a reasonably large ask in in the present day’s surroundings. And it’s not as if Newsom has a deep reservoir of goodwill to attract upon; simply have a look at his ballot numbers.
He went to South Carolina to, allegedly, marketing campaign for Democratic Home candidates, regardless that the state hasn’t a single aggressive contest. California has about 10 races that look to be a minimum of considerably aggressive — but you don’t see fellow Democrats clamoring for Newsom to drop by their districts.
Chabria: I don’t have a crystal ball. What I do have is a deep nicely of foreboding, however an optimist’s hope that your blue wave, power-to-the-people situation occurs.
Within the meantime, Newsom stated Friday that redistricting “will not be a bluff,” and he’s exploring a number of methods to do it.
On that listing is a authorized gamble. Our present redistricting legal guidelines say maps need to be drawn pretty each 10 years, after the census — however doesn’t particularly say we are able to’t gerrymander in between. Newsom is mainly suggesting dishonest with a sundown clause: Fast redistricting that advantages Democrats, however that will expire when the common redistricting occurs.
It’s drastic, and could wind up tied up in courts indefinitely.
However I’m annoyed that politicians, pundits and even common individuals proceed to deal with this administration as simply politics as regular, and I respect that Newsom will not be, even when a part of it’s pushed by private acquire for a 2028 presidential bid. Maybe our democracy has been on the brink earlier than, however that makes this cliff no much less harmful. We the individuals have to assume exterior of our common reactions to Republicans vs. Democrats or cultural wars or partisan divides or any of the much more innocent stressors which have plagued our system previously.
What I like about Newsom’s jab is that it forces us to have conversations like this one, and ask ourselves how can we struggle in another way?
As a result of this struggle is completely different.
Barabak: This will sound Pollyannaish, however I feel there’s nothing about these frightful instances that may’t be remedied on the poll field.
Texas might have a aggressive U.S. Senate race subsequent yr. If Texans don’t just like the ruthlessness of GOP lawmakers and their energy seize, they will ship a message by electing a Democrat, serving to the social gathering overcome the chances and take management of the chamber. That might put a examine on Trump, no matter whether or not Republicans grasp onto the Home.
It’s within the arms of voters. If democracy goes to be protected and preserved, it’s as much as them. Not scheming politicians.
