Need smarter insights in your inbox? Join our weekly newsletters to get solely what issues to enterprise AI, information, and safety leaders. Subscribe Now
VentureBeat’s unique interview with Sam Evans, CISO of Clearwater Analytics, reveals why enterprise browsers are rapidly changing into the frontline protection in opposition to shadow AI in its many kinds.
Evans confronted a essential problem in October 2023. Standing earlier than Clearwater Analytics’ board, he needed to confront considerations that workers may inadvertently expose information that might doubtlessly compromise the agency’s $8.8 trillion property underneath administration.
“The worst potential factor can be certainly one of our workers taking buyer information and placing it into an AI engine that we don’t handle,” Evans informed VentureBeat. “The worker not figuring out any completely different or making an attempt to resolve an issue for a buyer…that information helps prepare the mannequin.”
Right here is our dialog with Evans, edited for size and readability
VentureBeat: How do you see AI shaping cybersecurity at the moment?
Evans: The assaults have change into considerably extra refined. In the event you take into account it from the attitude of a foul actor, the phishing emails and makes an attempt we obtain have change into way more advanced. Nevertheless, AI additionally possesses response capabilities.
I like to elucidate it to our board, as the last word cat-and-mouse recreation. As dangerous actors begin to use AI to advance phishing, or maybe expedite the time it takes for exploits to emerge after vulnerabilities are introduced, there’s the other aspect of safety practitioners utilizing AI to assist advance how we reply.
VentureBeat: How is AI serving to your defensive capabilities?
Evans: We’ve begun integrating AI into our safety playbooks. By doing so, our safety analysts now spend much less time looking and searching. The AI is concerned within the safety operations heart (SOC) product, conducting its preliminary triage evaluation and saying, “Primarily based on earlier issues that we’ve seen and issues in my mannequin, that is the place I’d wish to information you.”
On the defensive aspect, we’re actually beginning to see AI come into play. CrowdStrike, Sentinel One, Microsoft Defender, the normal prolonged detection and response (EDR) merchandise have been utilizing some machine studying, and they might get to a likelihood of possibly 85% that this may very well be a risk, however we’re probably not certain. Nevertheless, AI enriches the EDR engine’s capacity to succeed in the next likelihood price of figuring out a risk.
VentureBeat: What retains you up at night time with regards to AI and cybersecurity?
Evans: The factor that does fear me fairly a bit is the deepfakes. You learn a number of tales about individuals utilizing deepfakes to impersonate a CEO to provoke wire transfers. These are regarding as a result of they do look very, very actual.
However the greatest concern? The worst potential factor can be certainly one of our workers taking buyer information and placing it into an AI engine that we don’t handle, after which it turns into information that helps prepare the mannequin.
VentureBeat: How did you clarify this shadow AI danger to your board?
Evans: I bear in mind when one of many first board conferences I used to be in, they requested me, “So what are your ideas on ChatGPT?” I mentioned, “Properly, it’s an unimaginable productiveness device. Nevertheless, I don’t know the way we might let our workers use it, as a result of my greatest worry is anyone copies and pastes buyer information into it, or our supply code, which is our mental property.”
However I didn’t simply come to the board with my considerations and issues. I mentioned, “Properly, right here’s my resolution. I don’t need to cease individuals from being productive, however I additionally need to defend it.” Once I got here to the board and defined how these enterprise browsers work, they’re like, “Okay, that makes a lot sense, however can you actually do it?”
VentureBeat: Stroll me by way of your analysis and deployment course of for Island.
Evans: After that October 2023 board assembly, we began a reasonably lengthy due diligence course of. We took a take a look at among the main distributors within the enterprise browser area.
I’ll share with you finally why we went with an Island. We would have liked to have the ability to management what browsers individuals are utilizing on their endpoints. It doesn’t do any good to deploy an enterprise browser when anyone can go and obtain Opera or “Frank’s browser of the month” and use it, and it simply bypasses all the Island controls.
The opposite motive we went with Island was really due to the velocity of the deployment. I bear in mind being on a name with Island salespeople, they usually’re saying, “We consider we are able to get this deployed in your organization in a matter of weeks.” I’m like, “Oh, that’s BS.”
VentureBeat: However they delivered?
Evans: They took it as a private problem! We began our Island deployment in April 2024 with about 200 individuals. We went the extension route first; the Island extension in Chrome and Edge.
It wasn’t till July when the board requested, “How is it going?” And I mentioned, “How about I simply present you?” I pulled up a screenshot as a result of, you realize, Murphy’s Regulation demos all the time fail. So I confirmed them screenshots, “Right here I’m on ChatGPT. I attempted to stick one thing in. I bought the immediate: ‘Island coverage prevents you from doing this.’”
They’re like, “Wow, that is implausible! However individuals can nonetheless make the most of the device to ask good questions?” I mentioned, “Yeah, completely. They simply can’t put information into it.”
VentureBeat: Do you are feeling that Island assures you and reduces the danger of Shadow AI?
Evans: It positively has helped us get a deal with on shadow AI. No safety device is 100% good. Having deployed Island, we positively sleep lots simpler. We are able to really feel fairly comfy that if an worker goes to an AI occasion that we don’t have licensed, they’ll use it, however can’t paste information or add information.
It’s additionally helped us establish the place now we have gaps. Workers discovered this actually nice AI widget factor, they arrive to the safety group, “Hey, look, examine this out.” After which we are able to come again to our product improvement groups and determine how we assist allow this, not only for our workers, however for our prospects.
VentureBeat: How do you defend in opposition to deepfakes?
Evans: That’s a tricky one to wrap your arms round. We have now a wonderful safety consciousness program. We ask workers to make use of frequent sense. Do you actually suppose Sandeep Sahai, our CEO, goes to name you up and ask you to purchase him Apple present playing cards?
We’ve arrange lots of checks and balances, form of just like the two-person buddy examine system. There’s no expertise resolution for one thing like that. It’s a human drawback that we’ve needed to implement a human resolution.
VentureBeat: What recommendation would you give different CISOs dealing with shadow AI?
Evans: This isn’t nearly blocking, it’s about enablement. Convey options, not simply issues. Once I got here to the board, I didn’t simply spotlight the dangers; I proposed an answer that balanced safety with productiveness.
Welcome to the shadow AI arms race
Evans’ insights reveal how rapidly shadow AI has change into an existential risk to each data-intensive enterprise.
“We see 50 new AI apps a day, and we’ve already cataloged over 12,000,” Itamar Golan, CEO of Immediate Safety, informed VentureBeat, quantifying what safety groups are calling their worst nightmare since ransomware.
The onslaught of unauthorized AI use and apps has triggered intense competitors amongst safety distributors. “Most conventional administration instruments lack complete visibility into AI apps,” Vineet Arora, CTO of WinWire, defined to VentureBeat, pinpointing precisely why shadow AI thrives as legacy safety architectures are blind to it.
The seller ecosystem has crystallized into 4 distinct battlegrounds, every with its weapons and weaknesses.
Enterprise browsers lead the cost. Foremost amongst them is Island, which not too long ago raised a $250 million funding spherical, a vote of confidence from the investor group. Whereas Island bets on pre-encryption visibility, Google Chrome Enterprise assaults shadow AI in another way, weaponizing its market dominance and Google’s safety stack. Chrome Enterprise Premium delivers information loss prevention (DLP) controls that block information flows to ChatGPT and different AI instruments, stop cross-profile contamination and implement real-time content material scanning. The platform exposes shadow AI utilization patterns whereas blocking each unintentional pastes and deliberate exfiltration. Strategic partnerships with Zscaler and Cisco Safe Entry amplify Chrome’s attain to create an ecosystem the place zero-trust ideas lengthen on to AI interactions.
SASE/SSE platforms ship enterprise-scale protection. Netskope and Zscaler deliver scale to shadow AI protection by way of their cloud-native safety entry service edge (SASE) architectures. Each platforms course of billions of transactions day by day throughout international infrastructures, with Netskope particularly promoting its capacity to observe AI software utilization throughout enterprises. Their key limitation: When 73.8% of office ChatGPT utilization happens by way of private accounts, SSL/TLS encryption prevents platforms from inspecting content material, forcing them to depend on visitors patterns and metadata, resulting in visibility gaps the place shadow AI operates undetected.
Conventional DLP distributors battle to adapt. Legacy distributors Forcepoint and Microsoft Purview have a powerful legacy to commerce on with regards to battling shadow AI. Forcepoint claims 1,700-plus classifiers whereas Purview leverages AI to triage duties. However right here’s the issue: They’re retrofitting Twentieth-century architectures for Twenty first-century threats. These platforms excel at compliance checkboxes and coverage templates however fail to maintain up with AI’s faster tempo.
As Daren Goeson, Ivanti’s SVP of product administration for UEM informed VentureBeat: “AI-powered endpoint safety instruments can analyze huge quantities of information to detect anomalies and predict potential threats sooner and extra precisely than any human analyst.” Conventional DLP operates at audit velocity. Shadow AI strikes at machine velocity.
Specialised options fill essential gaps. Innovation thrives within the niches that legacy distributors ignore. One instance is Ivanti Neurons, which delivers complete system discovery by way of its UEM platform, exposing shadow AI hiding in endpoints that conventional instruments miss. Mike Riemer, Ivanti’s Subject CISO, sees the larger image: “Safety professionals will successfully leverage the capabilities of gen AI to research huge quantities of information collected from numerous programs.” Dusk, for its half, targets developer groups with transformer fashions, claiming 2x detection accuracy for API based mostly AI instruments.
Evaluating Shadow AI Protection Options
| Vendor | Kind | Key Strengths | Limitations | Greatest For |
| Verify Level Concord | Browser extension | Leverages present infrastructure | Restricted to extension | Verify Level prospects |
| Forcepoint | Conventional DLP | 1,700+ classifiers, regulatory compliance | Legacy structure | Extremely regulated industries |
| Google Chrome Enterprise | Enterprise browser | Market dominance, native integration | Much less specialised controls | Google Workspace organizations |
| Island | Enterprise browser | Pre-encryption visibility, zero latency, Speedy deployment | Greater value per consumer | Enterprises with delicate information |
| Ivanti Neurons | UEM Platform | Complete system discovery | Not browser-specific | Asset administration focus |
| Microsoft Purview | DLP Platform | Native Microsoft integration, AI-powered triage | Microsoft-centric | Microsoft 365 enterprises |
| Netskope | SASE/SSE Platform | Complete protection, 370+ AI app monitoring | Publish-encryption complexity | Massive distributed enterprises |
| Dusk | AI-Native DLP | 2x detection accuracy, Transformer fashions | API-only method | Developer-centric groups |
| Talon Cyber Safety | Enterprise Browser | Browser + extension choices | Newer to market | Safety-conscious SMBs |
| Zscaler | SASE/SSE Platform | 536B day by day transactions, true zero-trust | Cloud-only method | Cloud-first organizations |
VentureBeat evaluation
What’s driving the market to maneuver so quick? VentureBeat’s evaluation discovered 74,500-plus shadow AI apps actively deployed throughout main consulting companies alone, and that’s rising 5% month-to-month. By mid-2026, that quantity might hit 160,000. Every represents a possible information breach, compliance violation, or aggressive intelligence leak.
Arora’s prescription cuts by way of vendor hype: “Organizations should outline methods with sturdy safety whereas enabling workers to make use of AI applied sciences successfully. Complete bans usually drive AI use underground, which solely magnifies the dangers.”
