Trump Classes for International Leaders in 2026

This 12 months, we requested our writers to distill the teachings of U.S. President Donald Trump’s first 12 months again within the White Home—and the way international leaders will doubtless apply these classes going ahead. Far more than throughout his first presidential time period, his administration has revolutionized U.S. international coverage, blanketing the world with tariffs, downgrading alliances, and in search of lodging with adversaries. It has been messy and infrequently unpredictable, however international leaders are studying easy methods to handle their relations with Washington in a extra unstable age.

Listed below are six classes from Trump’s second time period that can form international politics in 2026.—Stefan Theil, deputy editor

JUMP TO TOPIC AND AUTHOR

---

Lesson for China: The right way to Play Trump

By Zongyuan Zoe Liu, FP columnist and fellow on the Council on Overseas Relations

Whereas a lot of the world recoiled on the Trump administration’s tariff ultimatums, Beijing pushed again and emerged from 2025 largely unscathed. The teachings had been easy however consequential: Trump is now much more unrestrained, much less predictable, and extra keen to wield the U.S. economic system as a weapon than throughout his first time period. But even the sharpest U.S. strain could possibly be bent, blunted, and sometimes reversed.

Three classes stand out. First, Trump’s maximalist threats hardly ever stick. Headline-grabbing tariffs, sanctions, and tech bans typically yielded to market pressures, lobbying, or the president’s urge for food for any deal he might name a victory. Second, China’s accelerated commerce diversification gave it room to soak up U.S. strain and keep away from signaling weak point. Third, focused retaliation in opposition to U.S. provide chain vulnerabilities and politically delicate constituencies proved far more practical than broad counterstrikes.

Much more revealing was China’s execution of a playbook refined throughout Trump’s first-term commerce conflict and knowledgeable by practically a decade of expertise navigating U.S. export management regimes. Beijing has refined its personal export management regime and examined it in opposition to Washington by proscribing exports of important minerals and different upstream inputs—not simply symbolically however with enamel. The outcomes confirmed what Chinese language officers might have lengthy suspected: The U.S. provide chain is brittle. Value spikes, producer complaints, and lobbying strain supplied tangible proof. Trump’s reversal to permit shipments of Nvidia H200 chips to China was not goodwill; it was proof that Beijing’s calibrated strain has labored.

America’ newest Nationwide Safety Technique (NSS) reinforces this studying. Analysts famous its downgrading of geopolitical wrestle, as an alternative framing China primarily as an financial and technological competitor. The doc doesn’t promise détente, nevertheless it confirms the battlefield: financial and technological leverage—the very area the place China had simply confirmed its hand.

This expertise hardened one other lesson: Because the Trump administration approaches the midterm elections, the necessity to energize core supporters might make it even much less institutionally anchored, extra transactional, and extra centered on short-term political wins. Trump might thus be much more vulnerable to focused strain. He may be keen to make commerce or regulatory concessions that profit China—easing varied tariffs, adjusting expertise licensing guidelines, or permitting particular Chinese language companies into U.S. markets—whereas framing the strikes as victories: a efficiently negotiated “deal,” a “win” on the commerce deficit, or China stepping again from a few of its retaliation. Even when Trump’s concessions don’t instantly compromise core U.S. nationwide safety pursuits, they may create gathered vulnerabilities that China might exploit over time.

Beijing’s posture for 2026 is evident. It should pursue slender, transactional offers that permit Trump to assert victories whereas conceding little. It should deepen ties with Europe, Southeast Asia, and the Gulf states to dilute U.S. leverage and speed up home technological autonomy. Volatility is now structural; even Trump’s deliberate April go to won’t be able to restore the erosion of stability and belief. China doesn’t count on détente, solely time: time to check U.S. vulnerabilities, fortify its personal system, and be certain that Washington’s coercions more and more lose their chew. Endurance, precision, and calibrated leverage have turn out to be Beijing’s defining arsenal of statecraft.

Return to Full Record

---

Lesson for India: Restore U.S. Relations

By C. Raja Mohan, FP columnist and professor at O.P. Jindal International College

Few governments greeted Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency with as a lot enthusiasm as that of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. And few confronted better disappointment.

Modi was one of many first world leaders to fulfill Trump after his inauguration, and India rapidly launched commerce talks in recognition that commerce was now a central axis of U.S. international coverage.

But hopes for elevating the India-U.S. strategic partnership got here crashing down by August, when Trump raised the tariff on Indian items to 50 %. A part of the issue was Modi’s misreading of Trump’s grand delusions about peacemaking, particularly concerning India’s army clashes with Pakistan. Had Modi been extra effusive about Trump’s function in saving the subcontinent from itself, issues might need unfolded slightly in another way between New Delhi and Washington.

Modi’s advisors had an honest grasp of the coalition that propelled Trump again into the White Home. But they had been blindsided by the facility and fervor of the MAGA motion, which turned on India and its diaspora with sudden power. Since then, New Delhi has calibrated its strategy, which now rests on three rules: keep away from public arguments with Trump regardless of his repeated claims (that New Delhi thinks are false) of getting ended India’s conflict with Pakistan; reward his peace efforts in Gaza and Ukraine; and maintain the broader U.S. system engaged on commerce, expertise, and protection.

In 2026, New Delhi sees extra political house opening in Washington as Trump’s home standing exhibits indicators of abrasion. India’s technique now activates three axes.

First, mobilizing conventional pro-India constituencies—the safety institution, the U.S. Congress, enterprise teams, and diaspora networks that fell silent beneath the burden of Trump’s dominance in 2025. In the event that they had been reluctant to talk up earlier than, then a few of them would possibly now assist rebalance the connection. New Delhi additionally is aware of that it should discover a solution to make inroads with not less than elements of the MAGA coalition.

Second, India is decided to keep away from one other disaster with Pakistan that may invite Trump’s meddling. A contemporary spherical of army battle might place India on the receiving finish of Trump’s wild impulses as soon as once more.

Third, and most consequential, New Delhi is accelerating its diversification technique. The tariff shock pushed India to broaden export locations, fast-track commerce talks with Europe, and broaden financial hyperlinks with Russia and different rising markets. In safety coverage, India is hedging extra intentionally—sustaining the U.S. partnership whereas easing tensions with China, deepening ties with Russia, and strategically partaking with Europe.

Identical to individuals, international locations get used to ache. As Modi learns to handle Trump’s tariffs, he has found that standing agency in opposition to Washington’s bullying performs nicely at dwelling and earns respect overseas. For India’s conventional skeptics of america, Trump’s second time period is a reminder to not place too many strategic eggs within the U.S. basket. For the optimists, the turbulence of 2025 might but give solution to a greater footing in 2026 as Trump descends from the 12 months’s Olympian political heights. Underlying that optimism is India’s wager that greater than 25 years of bipartisan U.S. funding in a strategic partnership with it’s unlikely to be destroyed in a 12 months or two by even probably the most unpredictable White Home.

Return to Full Record

---

Lesson for Allies: Turn into Porcupines

By James Crabtree, FP columnist and visiting fellow on the European Council on Overseas Relations

As U.S. allies and companions adapt to the revolution in U.S. international coverage beneath Trump, one phrase finest captures the grim strategic calculus they now confront: porcupine. From Ukraine, the Baltic states, and Poland to Taiwan and Japan, doubtlessly susceptible nations are all drawing the identical uncomfortable conclusion from the previous 12 months—that survival in Trump’s new world order not is determined by old school U.S. ensures however on making your self too painful to assault.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky publicly acknowledged in December that NATO membership, a cornerstone of his nation’s strategic aspirations for the reason that first Russian invasion in 2014, is not a sensible objective. As a substitute, Ukrainian and European leaders are centered on a extra pragmatic goal: securing a cease-fire that gives sufficient respiratory house to rebuild army capabilities adequate to discourage future Russian aggression. “Ukraine should turn out to be a metal porcupine, undigestible for potential invaders,” as European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen put it not too long ago.

America’ new Nationwide Safety Technique exhibits that Washington’s dedication to the remainder of Europe’s safety can be conditional at finest. What holds for Ukraine absolutely holds for Russia’s different potential targets, particularly now that European NATO members can not depend on the previous chief of the trans-Atlantic West. Throughout Europe, the Trump shock has pushed international locations to speed up what was already their most vital rearmament in a technology, with main powers like Germany and Poland dramatically increasing their army budgets.

Taiwan has embraced a lot of the identical calculus. Washington’s safety commitments to Taipei have lengthy been formally ambiguous, however that strategic ambiguity has now been changed by altering presidential whims. This will probably be very true within the coming months, as Trump focuses on securing one thing he can name a “deal” with China and a state go to to go along with it.

Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te not too long ago introduced an formidable protection buildup that can elevate army spending to three % of GDP in 2026 and 5 % by the top of the last decade, reflecting alarm concerning the island’s strategic vulnerability. Taipei’s investments embrace cell anti-ship missiles, mines, and distributed air protection programs—an arsenal of porcupine weapons designed to make any Chinese language invasion try costlier as U.S. help turns into much less sure.

As in Europe, long-standing U.S. allies within the Indo-Pacific studied Trump’s erratic strategy in 2025 and noticed knowledge in creating sharper defensive quills of their very own. Japan is planning to speed up its protection transformation, with army spending on observe to exceed 2 % of GDP in 2026, one 12 months sooner than initially deliberate.

Throughout the Chilly Battle and post-Chilly Battle eras, Washington constructed an order the place allies might thrive beneath prolonged U.S. deterrence. Many duly prized their reliance on U.S. safety ensures. Now that Trump has made it abundantly clear that america will honor commitments solely when its president is excited by doing so, those self same nations are deciding that bristly metal spines present the most effective protection of all.

Return to Full Record

---

Lesson for CEOs: Suppose Twice About Investing

By Elisabeth Braw, FP columnist and senior fellow on the Atlantic Council

There have been many Trump surprises in 2025, together with a number of that affected the world of enterprise. One explicit incident shocked and shocked executives: The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s detention of practically 500 Hyundai and LG staff in Georgia in September.

The employees, you’ll recall, included 317 South Koreans who had come to Georgia to assist arrange a brand new plant that belonged to the 2 South Korean manufacturing giants. Organising a fancy fashionable manufacturing unit entails specialised expertise, and Hyundai and LG couldn’t discover such experience in Georgia on the fast. There was urgency, too: Trump had simply imposed a 25 % tariff on U.S. imports from South Korea, and Seoul was wanting to please the White Home by exhibiting how a lot its firms might put money into america. The notoriously lengthy wait concerned in getting a H-1B or comparable work visa threatened to derail this effort. As reported by the New York Instances, the South Koreans arrived in america on B-1 visas for short-term enterprise guests and the ESTA visa waiver program, which additionally permits short-term enterprise visits. That didn’t swimsuit ICE, which detained them.

The information got here as a shock to manufacturing executives who had been contemplating investing in america. With China changing into extra hostile to the West, many Western producers had made plans to “friendshore” to america, and Trump had them to take action in no unsure phrases (assume tariffs) inspired. Bringing business again to america is, in any case, the core of his financial program. The Trump shock that struck the executives was the belief that doing what he likes by organising manufacturing in america might backfire in opposition to their companies. That threat goes past ICE’s detention of staff. Any firm manufacturing in america that makes use of elements from around the globe—which is nearly each main producer right now—now will get hit by a number of heavy tariffs.

In 2026, I wouldn’t be shocked if this Trump shock prompts executives to have a look at non-U.S. locations for his or her services. From Vietnam to Quebec, international locations and areas have been rolling out the welcome mat for firms in search of to diversify their manufacturing away from China, and these jurisdictions are more likely to ramp up their efforts. America continues to be a sexy enterprise location, however firms hate nothing greater than uncertainty. Manufacturing consists of many phases, complicated provide chains, and investments deliberate for a long-term horizon. If any half malfunctions, experiences turbulence, or is all of a sudden disrupted by a brand new coverage, the entire chain will get out of whack.

The China shock of the early 2000s brought about wage melancholy and the lack of manufacturing jobs throughout the Western world. The upcoming Trump shock will probably be completely different: Will probably be executives’ awakening to the fact {that a} Trumpian United States is a really completely different place to do enterprise from what they anticipated.

Return to Full Record

---

Lesson for Europe: Maintain Calm and Carry On

By Agathe Demarais, FP columnist and senior fellow on the European Council on Overseas Relations

Final spring, U.S. Rep. Warren Davidson launched the Trump Derangement Syndrome Analysis Act, a invoice ordering the nation’s Nationwide Institutes of Well being to analysis why anybody would despise Trump and his insurance policies. Some international policymakers might very nicely be affected by an analogous syndrome: an onset of hysteria that leads them to undertake mind-boggling insurance policies. One such instance is the commerce settlement that Japan signed with america final 12 months, which pledged that $550 billion in Japanese taxpayers’ cash will probably be spent in america by January 2029.

To date, European leaders have managed to dodge the worst signs of this harmful syndrome. Regardless of claims on the contrary, the U.S.-European Union commerce deal struck in July is way from a European capitulation. As a substitute, Brussels appears already to have discovered some classes for dealing with Trump. First, Brussels averted losing time making an attempt to speak Trump out of his love for tariffs and settled for 15 %. Second, EU leaders neatly resisted the urge to impose retaliatory tariffs that may solely have harm their very own firms and shoppers. Third, the EU centered on unity: particular person European governments managed to suppress their instincts to hurry to Washington to ink bilateral offers, which might have weakened the EU’s collective bargaining energy.

In 2026 European leaders may have ample alternative to refine their playbook for managing Trump. A primary transatlantic battle issues Ukraine. In November, a proposed U.S.-Russian peace deal over the Europeans’ and Ukrainians’ heads made it very clear that Trump has his eyes set on $300 billion in frozen Russian central financial institution reserves, held primarily in Belgium and, to a lesser extent, France and different EU states. Second, Washington will most likely pile on the strain to power Europe to water down its digital guidelines—together with for transparency, content material moderation, and knowledge privateness—in return for decrease tariffs on EU-made metal. Third, this 12 months’s G-20 summit at a Trump-owned golf resort close to Miami, Florida, could also be filled with surprises. It isn’t laborious to think about Trump utilizing the gathering as a golden alternative to persuade and coerce leaders representing greater than 80 % of the worldwide economic system to signal bilateral offers benefiting america. To wage these three battles, the EU might want to maintain calm and keep it up. For Europe, self-help and unity stay the mantras of the day.

Return to Full Record

---

Lesson for Israel: Trump May Simply Rethink Assist

By Steven A. Prepare dinner, FP columnist and fellow on the Council on Overseas Relations

To say that Trump’s strategy to the Center East has been a shock is to decrease the that means of the phrase. Let’s assessment: He ordered air strikes on Iran’s nuclear services, compelled a cease-fire on Israel and Hamas, and met with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa—the possibly former jihadist—within the Oval Workplace. America is now sponsoring nation-building in Gaza, making an attempt to disarm Hezbollah, pushing for regular ties between Israel and Lebanon, and engaged in intensive discussions to increase safety ensures to Saudi Arabia.

This was not the withdrawal from the Center East that Trump supporters and sympathizers informed everybody could be his strategy to the area when he returned to workplace virtually one 12 months in the past. There could also be an “America First” international coverage within the minds of MAGA and the motion’s assume tanks, however the White Home abides by no such doctrine. It seems that U.S. international coverage, together with within the Center East, is predicated on Trump’s intestine, which is what he has been telling everybody who cares to pay attention. In the event you want written affirmation, the newest NSS is outstanding for its inconsistency—and for being hilariously at odds with Trump’s actions within the area.

So what’s going to Trump do in 2026? I by no means wager, however I’ll wager that he’s going to shake issues up relating to U.S. army help to Israel. Though the present help settlement doesn’t expire till late in Trump’s time period, the subject is already on his thoughts. Assembly with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the White Home final April, Trump mentioned, “We give Israel $4 billion a 12 months. That’s quite a bit. Congratulations, by the way in which.” That ought to be a heads up that Trump doesn’t assume this can be a nice deal, although the Israelis spend all this help in america.

There are many questions in each capitals concerning the extension of help. To date, Netanyahu advisor Ron Dermer has proposed a closing 20-year settlement, after which the help would cease. Phasing out U.S. army help is a good suggestion, however to get Trump on board, the Israelis must provide him one thing massive. They don’t have the sources to vow as much as $1 trillion in funding just like the Saudis have pledged, so that they must get inventive. A central theme of Trump’s three runs for the White Home was at all times his argument that Washington extends itself at nice prices for international peace and stability however by no means will get something in return. It’s now the Israelis’ flip to pay up.

Return to Full Record