From local weather knowledge, to price range forecasts, to intelligence studies, President Trump has challenged sources of knowledge inside his administration. NPR’s Leila Fadel talks to Peter Baker of the New York Occasions.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
What occurs when the president says U.S. authorities knowledge cannot be trusted? President Trump fired the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics in response to a jobs report he did not like. And yesterday, he insisted the true numbers have been really good.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: We had no confidence. I imply, the numbers have been ridiculous, what she introduced. However that was only one damaging quantity. All of the numbers appear to be nice.
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:
The information echoed a second from his first time period when, at a 2017 information convention, then-White Home press secretary Sean Spicer was requested why the president touted a optimistic jobs report after disparaging damaging ones.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
SEAN SPICER: I talked to the president previous to this. And he mentioned, to cite him very clearly, they could have been phony up to now, however it’s very actual now.
(LAUGHTER)
MARTIN: This 12 months, when Republicans have been debating a large tax and spending invoice, the nonpartisan Congressional Finances Workplace mentioned it might add trillions to the deficit. Trump accused the CBO of enjoying politics.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
TRUMP: CBO, who by no means offers good – principally, it is a Democrat group. And we’re getting great critiques on the invoice.
FADEL: Since Trump took workplace once more, we have reported on knowledge scrubbed from web sites for the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention. CDC webpages that monitor the well being of LGBTQ younger individuals disappeared totally. And elsewhere in immediately’s program, we’ll hear in regards to the administration’s plans to kill NASA satellites that measure greenhouse gases.
Peter Baker has been following all this, too. He is the chief White Home correspondent for The New York Occasions. Good morning, and thanks for being on this system.
PETER BAKER: Good morning. Thanks for having me.
FADEL: So each administration, Peter, tries to manage narratives. Each president spins details. However you argue that it is totally different with this president, with this administration. What’s totally different right here?
BAKER: Proper, precisely. I imply, look; this isn’t spinning details a lot as altering details or rejecting details which might be disadvantageous. It could be one factor if a president says, look; these job numbers do not imply that a lot for that reason or that motive. Right here you may have a president who’s saying the numbers are rigged. They’re phony. They cannot even be trusted – for no motive. There is not any proof that something untoward was executed with these statistics. He simply does not like them. He did not complain about these numbers when the numbers have been good. He is solely complaining about them once they have been unhealthy.
And the distinction between this and another administration is that by firing the one that gives the statistics, you are sending a message to all of presidency that you just higher be certain the data you present is data that the White Home goes to love reasonably than the data that is true. These are companies which might be presupposed to be nonpartisan, offering factual data that Republicans and Democrats can use to kind coverage. They are not presupposed to be taking sides. However, in impact, the president, by firing the chief statistician, is saying, I solely just like the statistics that match my view of actuality.
And, after all, it is a president who has lengthy been untethered, for instance, from exact reality. He got here to energy by telling folks that Barack Obama hadn’t been born on this nation, which wasn’t true. When he misplaced energy within the 2020 election, he instructed all people, nicely, that was as a result of there was widespread fraud, he had been cheated, which was not true. However now what he is making an attempt to do is implement different individuals to associate with his model of actuality irrespective of how true it is likely to be.
FADEL: Now, you simply listed this laundry record of knowledge that is both being questioned or eliminated totally. And you lately wrote that these techniques are proper out of an authoritarian playbook. Why do you say that? And what do students you spoke to say or evaluate the president’s efforts to?
BAKER: Nicely, they do. And I – look; I reported for 4 years from Moscow when Vladimir Putin got here to energy. And there is a lengthy historical past of this in locations like Russia or China, different locations the place they use knowledge to make arguments that no person can belief – that as a result of they’re perceived to be knowledge that is simply merely falsified or massaged or no matter, knowledge that may’t be trusted. We get this on a regular basis now when China says what its financial progress is. No one actually fully is aware of whether or not they can belief that or not as a result of it is a authorities that’s keen, we now have seen, to play quick and unfastened with numbers.
And that fear you hear in Washington immediately is that america is likely to be heading down the identical monitor. Authoritarian governments like to manage data to allow them to inform their individuals or inform themselves that issues are higher than they are surely. However that does not imply they really – they’re higher. And actually, you’ll be able to’t persuade any individual who’s misplaced a job or who could also be paying extra on the grocery retailer that they are not just because statistics are mentioned to be totally different. And I feel that that is one thing that we have not seen on this nation shortly.
FADEL: Now, the White Home has instructed us and others that the firing was as a result of this individual was completely incompetent, one thing that no proof was introduced for. However the transfer, this latest transfer and the opposite stuff you described – has this created a chilling impact on the individuals who collect and analyze knowledge for the federal government?
BAKER: Oh, it completely has. Folks perceive the message right here. They do not even want the White Home to inform them at this level that – to do that or that with web sites or with the data they’ve as a result of they know the implications there. They’ve seen what’s occurred to the top of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, they usually acknowledge that they themselves are in danger in the event that they offend the White Home.
FADEL: Peter Baker is chief White Home correspondent for The New York Occasions. Thanks in your time and your insights.
BAKER: Thanks. It is good speaking to you.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might fluctuate. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its authentic broadcast or publication. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.
