By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Scoopico
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
Reading: Opinion | What Is the Democrats’ Game Plan on ICE?
Share
Font ResizerAa
ScoopicoScoopico
Search

Search

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel

Latest Stories

Nancy Guthrie live updates: Neighbors asked to look for video footage from Jan. 11, Jan. 31
Nancy Guthrie live updates: Neighbors asked to look for video footage from Jan. 11, Jan. 31
U.S. January 2026 Jobs Report Numbers Are Surprisingly Good
U.S. January 2026 Jobs Report Numbers Are Surprisingly Good
Look Polished in Minutes With These Comfy Two-Piece Outfit Sets
Look Polished in Minutes With These Comfy Two-Piece Outfit Sets
Northern Capitals Unite for Arctic Defense Spending Gains
Northern Capitals Unite for Arctic Defense Spending Gains
TimesSquare International Small Cap Strategy Q4 2025 Commentary
TimesSquare International Small Cap Strategy Q4 2025 Commentary
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved
Opinion | What Is the Democrats’ Game Plan on ICE?
Opinion

Opinion | What Is the Democrats’ Game Plan on ICE?

Scoopico
Last updated: February 4, 2026 1:12 am
Scoopico
Published: February 4, 2026
Share
SHARE


Contents
What Is the Democrats’ Game Plan on ICE?After nearly four days of a partial government shutdown, the House voted to temporarily continue funding the Department of Homeland Security. Was it the right move? Times Opinion’s editor, Kathleen Kingsbury, argues that Democrats’ demands are reasonable, but they risk losing momentum before the next deadline.

new video loaded: What Is the Democrats’ Game Plan on ICE?

transcript

transcript

What Is the Democrats’ Game Plan on ICE?

After nearly four days of a partial government shutdown, the House voted to temporarily continue funding the Department of Homeland Security. Was it the right move? Times Opinion’s editor, Kathleen Kingsbury, argues that Democrats’ demands are reasonable, but they risk losing momentum before the next deadline.

So our government agreed to temporarily continue funding the Department of Homeland Security. “With the House passing a bill to end the partial government shutdown.” Now, you might be asking, did Democrats just roll over? The public is outraged over ICE’s egregious, inhumane tactics. Why didn’t they stop this? Here’s the thing. Shutting down the government wouldn’t have shut down ICE or Border Patrol. Their agents are considered essential workers, and the Department of Homeland Security is already well funded for years to come. So instead of forcing a shutdown, Democrats agreed to pass a continuing resolution. On one hand, this buys them a little more time to negotiate without disrupting other government agencies. On the other hand, Democrats are making a big bet here that by the next deadline, they’ll still have the leverage they need to get Republicans on board with their demands for ICE and Border Patrol. Spoiler alert: Those demands are not exactly radical. Democrats want an end to roving patrols, so agents can’t stop people just because they suspect they might be here illegally. “Hearing that you have an accent, I have reason to believe that you are not born of this country ——” They want officers to have a warrant issued by a judge before they can enter someone’s home or arrest them. “Agents broke into his home without a warrant.” They want agents to show their faces, wear body cameras and carry ID. And finally, they want to hold independent investigations when an officer is involved in a violent incident. Democrats might be able to hold on to their momentum and pass real reform. But for now, ICE will continue to operate with very few guardrails.

After nearly four days of a partial government shutdown, the House voted to temporarily continue funding the Department of Homeland Security. Was it the right move? Times Opinion’s editor, Kathleen Kingsbury, argues that Democrats’ demands are reasonable, but they risk losing momentum before the next deadline.

February 3, 2026

Lawyer work stoppage would not get the job carried out
Letters to the Editor: Giving customers cash instantly received’t repair our healthcare market
As the Post shrinks, other newspapers need to carry the torch
Opinion | Trumpism After Trump? Right here Are Three Realities.
Letters to the Editor: More and more costly elder care ‘nearly appears like a conspiracy’
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print

POPULAR

Nancy Guthrie live updates: Neighbors asked to look for video footage from Jan. 11, Jan. 31
U.S.

Nancy Guthrie live updates: Neighbors asked to look for video footage from Jan. 11, Jan. 31

U.S. January 2026 Jobs Report Numbers Are Surprisingly Good
Politics

U.S. January 2026 Jobs Report Numbers Are Surprisingly Good

Look Polished in Minutes With These Comfy Two-Piece Outfit Sets
Entertainment

Look Polished in Minutes With These Comfy Two-Piece Outfit Sets

Northern Capitals Unite for Arctic Defense Spending Gains
top

Northern Capitals Unite for Arctic Defense Spending Gains

TimesSquare International Small Cap Strategy Q4 2025 Commentary
Money

TimesSquare International Small Cap Strategy Q4 2025 Commentary

Google Nest, Amazon Ring cameras jumpstart debate about security vs. privacy
News

Google Nest, Amazon Ring cameras jumpstart debate about security vs. privacy

Scoopico

Stay ahead with Scoopico — your source for breaking news, bold opinions, trending culture, and sharp reporting across politics, tech, entertainment, and more. No fluff. Just the scoop.

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?