By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Scoopico
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
Reading: Tesla sues Calif. DMV after agency said the ‘self-driving’ cars don’t actually drive themselves
Share
Font ResizerAa
ScoopicoScoopico
Search

Search

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel

Latest Stories

Dem senator credits frog protesters with defeating Trump’s National Guard plans in Portland
Dem senator credits frog protesters with defeating Trump’s National Guard plans in Portland
Dani From ‘Love on the Spectrum’ Gives Dating Advice on TMZ Brunch Bus
Dani From ‘Love on the Spectrum’ Gives Dating Advice on TMZ Brunch Bus
Is Jane Street responsible for the Bitcoin slump?
Is Jane Street responsible for the Bitcoin slump?
Nvidia made 0 billion profit last year. Investors are worried.
Nvidia made $120 billion profit last year. Investors are worried.
Opinion | Trump’s Fantasy State of the Union
Opinion | Trump’s Fantasy State of the Union
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved
Tesla sues Calif. DMV after agency said the ‘self-driving’ cars don’t actually drive themselves
Tech

Tesla sues Calif. DMV after agency said the ‘self-driving’ cars don’t actually drive themselves

Scoopico
Last updated: February 26, 2026 9:09 pm
Scoopico
Published: February 26, 2026
Share
SHARE


Elon Musk’s Tesla is taking the California Department of Motor Vehicles to court, an attempt to win back the right to use the term “autopilot” when advertising its line of cars.

In a case filed Feb. 13, the electric vehicle giant claims that the department “wrongfully and baselessly” labeled Tesla a “false advertiser,” and argues that the department did not effectively prove that customers had been led to believe the vehicles could be operated without human oversight.

SEE ALSO:

Anthropic changes safety policy amid intense AI competition

Last year, a judge for California’s Office of Administrative Hearings ruled that the company had engaged in deceptive marketing by describing its fleet’s driver assistance systems as “Autopilot” modes. The court argued that Tesla’s Autopilot and “Full Self-Driving Capability” (FSD) did not meet the necessary autonomous driving criteria under NHTSA’s Levels of Automation system — the features are rated by the NHTSA as Level 2 automation, where Level 5 is a fully autonomous vehicle. The decision claims features need to be at least Level 3 to be described as “self-driving.”

Mashable Light Speed

In using such terms, Tesla has misled drivers and poses a consumer risk, the decision said. Tesla has faced multiple legal challenges that its self-driving features led to the deaths of multiple people. The company was found partially liable for a fatal, autopilot-related incident in August.

The California ruling went into effect on Jan. 15, and included a 30-day business suspension across the state unless the company ceased using the term in 60 days or changed its systems. Tesla responded in typical fashion: A tongue-in-cheek social post and a claim that sales would not be hit by the decision. Then, in January, the company effectively discontinued Basic Autopilot in the U.S., reshuffling its fleet offering with a standard traffic awareness mode and an option to upgrade your vehicle to FSD, now called “Full Self-Driving (Supervised).”

SEE ALSO:

Robot, take the wheel: What you need to know about autonomous vehicles rolling out across the U.S.

A few weeks later, the state’s DMV announced Tesla had met its obligations and would not face a suspension of its license, but now the company is fighting back against the decision with more force.

“An Administrative Law Judge found that Tesla broke state law by misleading consumers with the term ‘autopilot.’ Tesla agreed to stop this practice, and now they’re challenging it anyway. DMV is committed to protecting the traveling public and will defend the Administrative Law Judge’s findings and decision in court,” a DMV representative said in a statement to CNBC.

[/gpt3]

‘Good Boy’s star canine Indy pleads for the Academy Awards to listen to him out
How one can cease movies from autoplaying on X
NYT Pips hints, solutions for November 1
Meta delays ‘Phoenix’ blended actuality glasses launch
Love ChatGPT caricatures? 9 more image prompts to try in 2026.
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print

POPULAR

Dem senator credits frog protesters with defeating Trump’s National Guard plans in Portland
Politics

Dem senator credits frog protesters with defeating Trump’s National Guard plans in Portland

Dani From ‘Love on the Spectrum’ Gives Dating Advice on TMZ Brunch Bus
Entertainment

Dani From ‘Love on the Spectrum’ Gives Dating Advice on TMZ Brunch Bus

Is Jane Street responsible for the Bitcoin slump?
Money

Is Jane Street responsible for the Bitcoin slump?

Nvidia made 0 billion profit last year. Investors are worried.
News

Nvidia made $120 billion profit last year. Investors are worried.

Opinion | Trump’s Fantasy State of the Union
Opinion

Opinion | Trump’s Fantasy State of the Union

“Something to laugh about” – Kylie Kelce claps back at dismissive comments about female athletes during Winter Olympics
Sports

“Something to laugh about” – Kylie Kelce claps back at dismissive comments about female athletes during Winter Olympics

Scoopico

Stay ahead with Scoopico — your source for breaking news, bold opinions, trending culture, and sharp reporting across politics, tech, entertainment, and more. No fluff. Just the scoop.

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?