Right here’s what they are saying about one another : NPR

Elon Musk’s Grokipedia encyclopedia is now on-line, difficult volunteer-edited Wikipedia with a brand new software that comes with Grok, the big language mannequin chatbot developed by Musk’s synthetic intelligence firm, xAI.

Musk is positioning Grokipedia as a substitute for Wikipedia, which he referred to as “Wokepedia” in an X put up final December. Musk has lofty ambitions for the brand new encyclopedia: His said objective is to create “an open supply, complete assortment of all information.”

Critics and pundits are busy evaluating the 2 websites and the way they current a variety of controversial subjects. However we will additionally find out about a few of their variations by asking a easy query: What do Wikipedia and Grokipedia say about one another?

Trying to find one another

A search for “Wikipedia” on Grokipedia yielded 6,047 outcomes early Wednesday, a quantity that displays each the work that is gone into Grokipedia and the problem of competing with an encyclopedia that is been rising for almost 25 years.

On Wikipedia, a search for “Grokipedia” returned 13 outcomes.

In the meantime, two days after its Monday launch, a seek for “Grokipedia” on Grokipedia didn’t return a devoted entry. As a substitute, the eight search outcomes ranged from a basic entry about on-line encyclopedias to seven entries primarily about Wikipedia.

Typing “grokipedia” into Grokipedia’s URL to see if the brand new encyclopedia may need an entry that is not but searchable returns a message: “This web page does not exist … but.”

Bias and imitation

On its web page about Wikipedia, Grokipedia says the positioning is famend for its “unprecedented scale, accessibility, and function in democratizing data.” However Grokipedia additionally says Wikipedia is the topic of “persistent criticisms concerning factual reliability, susceptibility to vandalism and hoaxes, and systemic ideological biases — notably a left-leaning slant in protection of political figures and subjects.”

The prolonged article makes use of types of the phrase “bias” dozens of instances. It alleges that Wikipedia suffers from “ideological skew” to the left, and states that the positioning’s choice for a impartial perspective drawn from dependable sources can as a substitute reinforce narratives that “align with institutional biases in academia and media.”

On its web page about Grokipedia, Wikipedia says that Musk “positioned Grokipedia as a substitute for Wikipedia that will ‘purge out the propaganda.'” It additionally notes that Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger, who has change into a critic of the long-running encyclopedia, welcomed Grokipedia’s arrival.

The Wikipedia article about Grokipedia highlights criticisms of the brand new website, similar to media reviews that Grokipedia’s article about Elon Musk omits point out of the controversy over a gesture he made earlier this 12 months “which many seen as resembling a Nazi salute.” It additionally says critics allege Grokipedia promotes right-leaning views and depends an excessive amount of on AI instruments.

Wikipedia additionally notes that Grokipedia appears to have pulled textual content from Wikipedia, stating, “Some articles are almost similar to their Wikipedia entries.”

In some circumstances, Grokipedia duplicates Wikipedia content material, as famous by media retailers and Wikipedia customers. Grokipedia’s web page on “buttocks,” as an illustration, is nearly a replica of the Wikipedia web page (albeit with out pictures).

In that and comparable circumstances, the articles acknowledge that their “content material was tailored from Wikipedia.”

Musk stated on the All-In Podcast convention in September that Grok was working to judge data from sources similar to Wikipedia pages after which “rewrite the web page to … take away the falsehoods, appropriate the half-truths and add the lacking context.”

Like Wikipedia, Grokipedia customers can see an article’s edit historical past. However whereas Wikipedia customers can immediately edit a narrative, Grokipedia gives instruments to ask questions and submit a correction.

“Wikipedia’s information is — and at all times shall be — human,” the Wikimedia Basis stated in a press release to NPR. Noting the positioning’s ethos of open collaboration and consensus, it added, “This human-created information is what AI corporations depend on to generate content material; even Grokipedia wants Wikipedia to exist.”

Nuts and bolts

Numbers rule the web, and these two websites are pretty correct about their rival’s measurement, with some caveats.

Wikipedia, as an illustration, says that Grokipedia had “about 900,000 AI-generated articles” as of Oct. 28. That very same day, Grokipedia’s website stated it had 885,279 articles out there — a determine printed on its touchdown web page. The Wikipedia entry for Grokipedia did not reference that exact quantity, and it cited an article from the Indian monetary information website Moneycontrol as a substitute of Grokipedia’s information — maybe to seize a historic document of a determine that shall be up to date. An editor later up to date the quotation to level to an Axios article.

Grokipedia precisely states that as of October 2025, Wikipedia had greater than 7 million articles in English, within the foremost entry about its older rival. However additional down that web page, the entry muddies the water a bit by stating that Wikipedia had “over 6.8 million articles in English alone by October 2025.”

In keeping with Wikipedia’s working rely on the Dimension of Wikipedia web page, the English website had greater than 6.9 million articles as of January 2025.

Disclosure: NPR CEO Katherine Maher is the previous CEO of the Wikimedia Basis.