Piers Morgan reignited debate over gender identification and sexuality after asserting on X (previously Twitter) that the “trans fad” is a “social contagion,” whereas emphasizing that homosexuality shouldn’t be a selection however “a sexual actuality”.
His put up on November 28, 2025, adopted a contentious trade with Tucker Carlson, whose latest podcast episode featured repeated use of an anti-gay slur whereas framing its utilization as a free-speech concern.
Tucker Carlson reportedly pressed Piers Morgan to say the slur on digicam, citing a UK hate-crime case highlighted by The Every day Mail, and claiming that “you’re allowed to be homophobic if you would like in a free nation,” based on media protection on November 28, 2025.
Piers Morgan seemingly declined, arguing that offensive language is pointless when discussing ladies’s rights or the gender debate. The conflict has since gone viral, sparking broader discussions on homophobia, censorship, and the rhetoric surrounding trans identities.
Extra about Piers Morgan’s assertion and the continuing trans debate
Piers Morgan’s put up got here amid an intensifying cultural battle over transgender identification. His phrasing seemingly aligns with a place he has repeated in interviews: that considerations over gender coverage may be raised with out resorting to slurs or demeaning language towards LGBTQ+ individuals.
That stance resurfaced forcefully throughout his trade with Tucker Carlson, who tried to attract Morgan right into a real-time take a look at of his views on free speech by urging him to repeat the anti-gay slur central to a latest UK court docket case.
Piers Morgan refused, arguing that the flexibility to critique parts of the trans debate doesn’t require utilizing language that targets homosexual individuals or different teams. When Carlson steered he was avoiding the time period out of worry of arrest, Morgan countered that he merely selected to not say it.
In keeping with some media experiences from November 27, 2025, Piers Morgan later publicly clarified that his refusal had nothing to do with authorized repercussions and all the things to do with the phrase being “offensive to homosexual individuals.”
Morgan’s place reportedly rests on a distinction he has repeatedly drawn: that whereas he believes sure points of transgender identification developments quantity to “social contagion,” sexual orientation is innate. His critics reportedly argue that such framing dangers minimizing the validity of trans identities, whereas supporters view it as a protection of organic classes and ladies’s rights.
Tucker Carlson’s free-speech problem and use of a slur
The conflict between Carlson and Morgan originated throughout an episode of The Tucker Carlson Present, the place Carlson reportedly challenged Morgan to repeat the slur utilized in textual content messages by Elizabeth Kinney, a UK lady convicted of a hate crime and given a neighborhood order. Carlson framed the case for example of overreach in British hate-speech enforcement
Tucker Carlson insisted his utilization of the slur was an act of defiance in opposition to censorship and denied being anti-gay, arguing that folks ought to decide him by his conduct quite than the phrases he’s “allowed” to say. He additionally invoked comparisons to reclaimed in-group utilization of different slurs, drawing additional criticism on-line.
Piers Morgan pushed again, stating Carlson wouldn’t say the phrase on to a homosexual particular person and that invoking slurs is pointless for making arguments about free speech or criticizing gender-identity activism. Regardless of Carlson’s repeated prodding, Morgan maintained that declining to make use of the phrase was merely a matter of precept.
Edited by Devangee
