To the editor: If the 2nd Modification said that “frequent drunkards” have been to be prohibited from having weapons, then why isn’t this regulation being utilized to the modern-day model of that (“Supreme Court docket will resolve if ‘recurring drug customers’ lose their gun rights below 2nd Modification,” Oct. 20)?
If these “slim circumstances” calling for limiting gun rights for marijuana and drug customers are utilized as a result of these folks would possibly “pose a grave danger of armed, hostile encounters with law enforcement officials whereas impaired,” then they need to apply it to individuals who habitually devour alcohol.
Let’s see the way it works when those that hit the bars lose their open-carry permits.
Andrea Brown, Santa Barbara
