Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen speaks throughout a media convention on the EU Summit in Brussels, Friday, Dec. 19, 2025.
Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP
disguise caption
toggle caption
Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP
In a placing collective rebuke to President Trump, the leaders of Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the UK issued a joint assertion Sunday condemning latest U.S. tariff threats tied to army actions they’ve taken in Greenland.
Within the assertion, leaders of the eight nations underscored their dedication to shared NATO objectives, saying that they stood in “full solidarity” with Denmark and Greenland. In addition they reaffirmed their willingness to “have interaction in a dialogue based mostly on the ideas of sovereignty and territorial integrity” in response to President Trump’s repeated threats to take management of Greenland, which is presently an autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark.
On Saturday evening, President Trump had written on his Reality Social platform that he would impose tariffs on imports from the eight nations. Trump’s phrases got here after the nations, that are all in NATO, deployed army personnel to Greenland in latest days, to take part in a Danish-led Arctic train generally known as ‘Arctic Endurance’.
Trump mentioned America would levy a ten p.c tariff on items from the eight nations beginning on February 1. He claimed these tariffs would rise to 25 p.c on June 1, and stay in place “till such time as a Deal is reached for the Full and Whole buy of Greenland” by the US.
Of their joint response, the eight NATO nations mentioned that Trump’s proposed tariffs “undermine transatlantic relations and danger a harmful downward spiral.”

“As members of NATO, we’re dedicated to strengthening Arctic safety as a shared transatlantic curiosity,” the leaders mentioned. “The pre-coordinated Danish train ‘Arctic Endurance’ performed with Allies, responds to this necessity. It poses no risk to anybody.”
The coordinated assertion displays an unusually specific diplomatic pushback by key U.S. allies. As well as, some particular person European leaders issued their very own particular person criticisms.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned using tariffs in opposition to allies, calling it “utterly unsuitable”. A spokesman for the UK Prime Minister later mentioned Starmer had shared this view with President Trump in a cellphone name on Sunday. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson mentioned Sweden wouldn’t be “blackmailed,” whereas Norway’s prime minister pressured that “threats don’t have any place amongst allies.”
Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen additionally made a press release, praising “nice assist” from European allies. “I’m happy with the constant messages from the remainder of the continent: Europe is not going to be blackmailed,” Frederiksen mentioned.
European international coverage leaders made clear that commerce coercion would hurt the broader transatlantic relationship and doubtlessly derail different ongoing negotiations.
One unnamed French official near Overseas Minister Jean-Noël Barrot informed NPR that Paris had mobilized its diplomatic equipment “to coordinate a European response to the brand new, unacceptable tariff threats issued by President Trump.”
The official added that Barrot had been in talks together with his British, German and EU counterparts and was involved with all affected international ministers and European Parliament political teams.
Odd residents have additionally registered their opposition to President Trump’s latest threats, with massive protests in Denmark and Greenland in opposition to American strain alongside the broader NATO debates about Arctic safety in addition to the diplomatic scramble.
In his social media put up on Saturday, Trump framed Europe’s actions as a part of “a really harmful state of affairs” and argued the tariffs have been needed to guard “World Peace and Safety” – language that has been extensively challenged by European officers and analysts as exaggerated or unfounded given the context of NATO cooperation within the Arctic.

This newest tariff standoff follows weeks of more and more assertive U.S. rhetoric relating to Greenland and Arctic coverage. Trump has repeatedly declared Greenland — an unlimited, sparsely populated territory — as strategically very important to U.S. nationwide safety, citing its location and untapped mineral assets.
Greenlandic and Danish leaders have constantly pushed again, insisting the territory shouldn’t be on the market, most just lately throughout discussions between the 2 nations’ international ministers and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Domestically, the tariff resolution has sparked pushback not solely overseas however amongst U.S. lawmakers. Bi-partisan voices in Congress have criticized the strategy as damaging to NATO cohesion, and warned that it may jeopardize U.S. credibility.
Analysts have identified that the US already maintains a army presence in Greenland, which has shrunk dramatically over the many years, and so query the need of coercive financial measures tied to territorial ambitions.