Elon Musk’s reply to Wikipedia is now right here. On Monday, Musk introduced that his personal on-line encyclopedia, Grokipedia, was now dwell.
In line with Musk, the present model of Grokipedia is just “model 0.1” however he claimed that it is already “higher than Wikipedia.”
This Tweet is at the moment unavailable. It could be loading or has been eliminated.
Up till a couple of years in the past, Elon Musk often shared hyperlinks to Wikipedia entries on X, then often called Twitter. Nevertheless, since he has taken a flip into far-right politics, Musk has develop into a significant critic of Wikipedia, claiming it has a left-wing bias. He has lately began referring to the positioning as “Wokipedia” and has made calls to “defund” or cease donating to Wikimedia, the nonprofit that runs the platform.
Nevertheless, for supposedly being higher than Wikipedia, Musk’s Grokipedia seems to tear off a major quantity of content material from it.
For instance, as The Verge seen, the Grokipedia entry for the Sony online game console PlayStation 5 is a whole word-for-word copy of the Wikipedia entry for PlayStation 5. Musk’s Grokipedia even copied and pasted the very same desk of contents for the totally different sections of the PlayStation 5 entry. Even the cited exterior sources are the identical, though it seems Grokipedia has modified the order of how they’re listed.
Left:
Credit score: Wikipedia
Proper:
Credit score: Grokipedia / Wikipedia
Grokipedia did add one factor to its PlayStation 5 entry that is not discovered on the Wikipedia model. A disclaimer on the very backside of the web page, which admits that it “tailored” the content material from Wikipedia.
“The content material is customized from Wikipedia, licensed beneath Artistic Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License,” it reads. As a result of Wikipedia content material is revealed beneath the Artistic Commons public license, Grokipedia can republish its content material beneath sure circumstances.
Mashable Mild Velocity
The copying drawback seems to be in depth. We used the plagiarism detection service Copyscape to verify the Grokipedia entry for the Titanic, and Copyscape discovered that 18 % of the web page, or about 3,600 phrases, have been copied word-for-word from Wikipedia. On the prime of Grokipedia’s entry, it incorporates this discover: “Truth-checked by Grok yesterday.”
Left:
Credit score: Wikipedia
Proper:
Credit score: Grokipedia / Wikipedia
That implies that Grokipedia is meant extra as a fact-checking device than a real different to Wikipedia.
Not like Wikipedia, which has human editors who volunteer to contribute to the positioning, Musk’s Grok AI is answerable for the content material that will get posted on Grokipedia. And plainly in lots of circumstances, Grok is simply scraping Wikipedia entries of their entirety and pasting its contents on Grokipedia’s personal website.
Social media customers are persevering with to find quite a few Grokipedia entries which might be lifted immediately from the corresponding Wikipedia entries, usually with no adjustments.
The Grokipedia entry for composer Franz Liszt? Plagiarized from Wikipedia. The Grokipedia entry for the Miller Impact? Copied sentence-by-sentence from the Wikipedia article. Grokipedia’s web page for the PC-98? Taken from Wikipedia.
One Wikipedia contributor discovered their very own contribution to an entry was copied line-for-line and revealed on Grokipedia.
This Tweet is at the moment unavailable. It could be loading or has been eliminated.
So, how does Grokipedia differ from the supposedly woke Wikipedia?
A few of the extra politically charged articles on Grokipedia seem to have been rewritten as a way to add a right-leaning bent, however an unlimited portion of Musk’s Wikipedia different seems to only be Wikipedia itself.
[/gpt3]
