Denise Richards is taking authorized motion to get Aaron Phypers and his household out of the house they as soon as shared collectively.
In response to court docket paperwork obtained by Us Weekly on Wednesday, August 20, Richards, 54, filed a declaration asking the decide to take away Phypers, 52, and his household from the home they lived in throughout their marriage so she will return to the property to retrieve some private belongings she left behind following her transfer.
“Once I moved out over two years [ago], I left lots of my private gadgets and my late mom’s gadgets on the home primarily based on Aaron telling me that his household could be transferring again to Canada and we’d be transferring again into the [home],” the docs learn.
Richards’ canine have additionally allegedly been on the property since Could whereas she recovered from two surgical procedures. Richards claimed that Phypers agreed to that association.
Nonetheless, Richards alleged that she acquired a message from the property’s landlord final month stating that he’ll start “eviction proceedings” beginning Saturday, August 23, and demanded that the residence be vacated. The owner allegedly advised Richards that Phypers has not been aware of his messages and has not been paying hire. In response to Richards, she knowledgeable Phypers in January that he could be answerable for the house’s cost.
Within the docs, Richards said that she is nervous about her belongings presumably getting broken and needs to have the ability to retrieve the gadgets and her animals with out Phypers being current.
Richards claimed that “Aaron and his mother and father and brother have severely broken” the house because it was “in a state of disarray.” She included photographs that confirmed patches of eliminated flooring, a number of containers, articles of clothes and papers scattered round.
In her submitting, Richards requested that Phypers and his household not be current on the property on Saturday whereas she retrieves her gadgets and pets. She additionally requested that there won’t be any recording or listening units on the property throughout that point.
Us has reached out to Phypers for remark.
Phypers submitted a response on Wednesday stating that he doesn’t “consent to [the] order requested” by Richards.
“There isn’t any emergency or exigent circumstance and the court docket ought to deny [her] ex parte request,” the docs learn.
He additionally requested if the court docket does take into account issuing Richards’ order, he would love the “alternative to retrieve” his personal “private belongings” from the previous residence the place Richards presently resides.
Phypers filed for divorce from Richards in July after seven years of marriage. He cited “irreconcilable variations” as the rationale for the break up. Days after information broke of their divorce, Richards accused Phypers of bodily abuse throughout their marriage and requested a restraining order in opposition to her ex.
“All through our relationship, Aaron would ceaselessly violently choke me, violently squeeze my head with each fingers, tightly squeeze my arms, violently slap me in my face and head, aggressively slam my head into the lavatory towel rack, threaten to kill me, maintain me down along with his knee on my again to the purpose the place I must plead with him to get off me in order that he wouldn’t kill me and hack into my laptop computer and cellphone and obtain all of my textual content messages,” Richards wrote in a declaration.
Phypers denied Richards’ allegations in a press release to Us, saying, “Let me be unequivocally clear: I’ve by no means bodily or emotionally abused Denise — or anybody. These accusations are utterly false and deeply hurtful. Denise and I, like many {couples}, have confronted our share of challenges, however any suggestion of abuse is categorically unfaithful. I’ve at all times tried to strategy our marriage with love, endurance, and respect. I ask for privateness as we navigate private issues, and I hope that the general public and media will chorus from spreading dangerous and baseless claims.”