If there was any doubt that the present U.S. administration is the world’s biggest menace to motion on local weather change, President Trump eliminated it on Sept. 23 when he addressed the U.N. Common Meeting and referred to as local weather change “the best con job ever perpetrated on the world” and a menace promoted by “silly folks.”
He went on to ridicule Europe for decreasing its carbon footprint by 37% and to extol the virtues of “clear, lovely coal.” That’s fairly clear lower, as is the specter of local weather change.
So, the query looms: What are the overwhelming majority of countries that acknowledge the specter of local weather change going to do? Sadly, up to now the reply seems to be “little or no,” however the worldwide group might do one thing, and shortly. Those self same nations that assembled on the U.N. have a weapon at their disposal that would deliver the U.S. again into the fold, a weapon that has been enthusiastically endorsed by Trump, one which could possibly be deployed quickly and can be easy to manage.
Earlier than attending to that, slightly background. Earlier in 2025, the Worldwide Maritime Group, a U.N. company, took a tentative step within the route of worldwide motion on local weather change by proposing a payment on fossil gasoline emissions from ships concerned in international commerce, a proposal the group was speculated to formally undertake this fall. Even this timid step — delivery accounts for only one.4% of greenhouse gasoline emissions — provoked speedy threats from the Trump administration to impose tariffs or in any other case sanction nations that signed on.
The threats labored — the fractious assembly ended with the vote postponed for a 12 months — however, with political will from the world’s nations, there’s a simple option to counter these threats and make a significant discount in international emissions.
Neglect about piecemeal actions. The worldwide group might conform to a common tariff that may be imposed on these nations that fail to scale back their annual emissions by a specified quantity (3% yearly is smaller than is required to forestall an increase of two levels Celsius from pre-industrial ranges, however most likely as massive a discount because the worldwide group would settle for). The Trump administration’s divide-and-conquer bluster wouldn’t work on an internationally agreed upon tariff; he can’t impose sanctions on the whole international group, or if he did, the ache would largely be felt by the U.S. itself.
A number of companies and establishments monitor every nation’s emissions, and the tariffs could possibly be administered by the World Commerce Group, which has already declared that local weather change is a matter it should handle. Cash collected might assist poor nations obtain reductions. Such a tariff would symbolize motion on the scale wanted. It will be easy to manage, and it wouldn’t contain the countless, complicated negotiations which have neutered each earlier local weather change initiative and are susceptible to gaming.
A common tariff is a low-hanging fruit on the local weather motion tree, and the Trump administration’s center finger to the Common Meeting could possibly be a wanted name to motion because the world continues to sleepwalk right into a local weather catastrophe. Protecting temperatures from rising greater than 1.5 levels Celsius, the primary hazard level specified by the Paris Settlement, is mainly a misplaced trigger. The world will see a continued rise in financial and social damages inflicted by excessive storms, droughts, floods, temperatures and wildfires. It’d nonetheless be attainable, nonetheless, to forestall the rise in such occasions from persevering with to speed up.
One step towards slowing local weather change can be recognizing that decreasing international emissions represents a possibility for the best financial stimulus program of all time because the world shifts its vitality base away from fossil fuels and adjusts growth and infrastructure priorities to local weather realities.
One other step can be recognizing that no international local weather motion will likely be attainable with out taking part in hardball with the Trump administration, just because any local weather motion will likely be nullified if the world’s largest financial system makes use of its would possibly to counter these efforts.
Whereas Trump would possibly consider he delivered a triumphant and dominant message to the world leaders gathered on the U.N., the messages obtained have been very completely different. One of many loudest was that the U.S. authorities goes to do all the things it could actually to hasten a local weather catastrophe. If that doesn’t provoke the worldwide group, nothing will, and the world will proceed to hurtle towards its appointment with local weather future.
Eugene Linden is the writer of “Fireplace & Flood: A Folks’s Historical past of Local weather Change From 1979 to the Current.”
Insights
L.A. Instances Insights delivers AI-generated evaluation on Voices content material to supply all factors of view. Insights doesn’t seem on any information articles.
Viewpoint
Views
The next AI-generated content material is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Instances editorial workers doesn’t create or edit the content material.
Concepts expressed within the piece
- The Trump administration stands because the world’s biggest obstacle to international local weather motion, demonstrated by the president’s specific dismissal of local weather change as a fabrication and condemnation of countries pursuing emissions reductions
- The worldwide group should abandon incremental approaches and implement a unified, binding mechanism quite than interact in countless complicated negotiations which have persistently weakened local weather initiatives
- A common tariff imposed on nations failing to realize specified annual emissions reductions would successfully stop the Trump administration’s divide-and-conquer technique from undermining coordinated international motion
- Such a system would leverage present emissions monitoring infrastructure and could possibly be administered via the World Commerce Group with out requiring intricate negotiations susceptible to manipulation
- Although the 1.5-degree Celsius goal established by the Paris Settlement is functionally unachievable, stopping additional acceleration of local weather disasters stays possible via aggressive worldwide coordination
- The Trump administration have to be confronted straight via hardball ways, as any local weather progress will likely be negated with out addressing its deliberate opposition
- World emissions reductions symbolize an unprecedented financial stimulus alternative because the world transitions its vitality infrastructure away from fossil fuels
Completely different views on the subject
- Some local weather scientists preserve that broadly cited local weather assessments current worst-case eventualities that require verification in opposition to different datasets quite than acceptance at face worth[1]
- Monetary specialists query predictions of imminent market collapse in climate-vulnerable actual property, with outstanding economists suggesting that catastrophic housing defaults and mortgage delinquencies stay comparatively unlikely regardless of rising insurance coverage prices[1]
- Extra optimistic assessments of humanity’s capability to handle local weather challenges emphasize that enough numbers of gifted professionals are devoted to growing options, positioning civilization to emerge from the local weather disaster into an period of stabilized situations[1]
- Some analysts distinguish between rational market-based options to local weather adaptation, the place correct threat pricing naturally encourages migration away from susceptible areas, and extra interventionist governmental approaches[1]
