Among the many many audiences Gov. Gavin Newsom has provoked currently, one cohort is especially fired up: menopausal ladies. I do know I felt a rush of adrenaline (or maybe it was a sizzling flash?) after I noticed actor Halle Berry take to Instagram this week to demand the governor make menopause a public coverage precedence.
From Hollywood to Capitol Hill, menopause continues to be having a second. However no entity has succeeded greater than state lawmakers in reworking all of the buzzy headlines into significant motion.
Earlier this summer season, CNN and NPR declared a “nationwide motion” for menopause legislative exercise, reporting a file 15 states introducing upward of two dozen payments as of July. So speedy and sturdy was this agenda, the digital information outlet Axios dubbed menopause coverage “the brand new tampon tax” — one other seemingly out-of-the-blue however wildly fashionable reform that swept by statehouses in recent times. (California is one in all 22 states that has repealed gross sales tax on menstrual merchandise over the past decade.)
The momentum was not so sudden to me, although. I’ve written over many years on menstruation and menopause. I’ve engaged firsthand with lawmakers of all political stripes dedicated to those points — for instance, those that handed legal guidelines to ease the burden of the price of interval merchandise. After the 2024 elections, I suspected there might be new political will to sort out menopause and embrace insurance policies that might assist ameliorate the challenges of discovering enough care and remedy for all its disruptive signs.
This conviction led me to group up with main medical specialists to publish a Citizen’s Information to Menopause Advocacy again in January, with a foreword by the journalist and former California first girl Maria Shriver. We set forth lots of the reforms that states at the moment are embracing — issues like higher training for medical doctors and higher data offered by public well being departments, improved entry to and insurance coverage protection of menopause therapies, and extra sturdy office protections and lodging.
Immediately, seven states have menopause legal guidelines on the books; California is one in all them, having codified help for restricted persevering with medical training alternatives for suppliers. The tally will certainly develop as a number of extra states tee up new proposals for 2026 — like in Michigan, the place a bipartisan pair of lawmakers just lately filed a number of payments and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer kicked off a listening tour in communities across the state.
Right here and now, all eyes must be on California’s newest legislative transfer. A 2025 invoice championed by Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, AB 432, now poised for passage, addresses two key wants — affordability of care (requiring medical health insurance plans to cowl menopause therapies) and high quality of care (incentivizing clinicians to include menopause-specific coaching as a part of their skilled licensing persevering with training requirement).
AB 432 is a modified model of prior laws that handed final yr however was vetoed by Newsom, who argued on the time its provisions have been “too far-reaching.” The present legislative language is conscious of his considerations, for instance limiting protection to FDA-approved menopause therapies. However there’s no assure of a gubernatorial inexperienced gentle, given statewide infighting over a broader array of medical health insurance practices and insurance policies.
There’s something a lot deeper than a single legislation at stake in California. The state is able to be a frontrunner on menopause points — not a lot within the particular provisions, however within the tradition.
California wouldn’t be the primary state to cross the provisions which are in AB 432. As for insurance coverage protection, Louisiana holds that banner; its legislature turned the primary within the nation to require Medicaid and personal medical health insurance plans to cowl perimenopause and menopause therapies. Amongst different states on the fore, Illinois now has a devoted Menopause Consciousness Week, Maine handed funding for state well being division instructional assets, and Rhode Island is the primary to ascertain office lodging protections.
However Newsom’s personal model as a contemporary democracy avenger — California’s position in driving the nationwide redistricting disaster response, the state’s self-proclaimed standing as a secure haven for abortion rights — makes for a ripe alternative to show and articulate that menopause belongs squarely within the pro-democracy discourse too.
Menopausal ladies are a contingent 75 million sturdy within the U.S. and entitled to accessible, competent healthcare and remedy. Our amassed knowledge and expertise contribute profoundly to the financial system, to tradition, to the physique politic. Now we have each proper to demand lawmakers and political leaders put money into our well-being, our dignity, our humanity. And we all know that once we combat for ourselves, we additionally combat for our daughters — and for the longer term.
Halle Berry’s marketing campaign is cleverly known as “Flip Up the Warmth.” Who higher than a military of menopausal ladies to take action? Our democracy might be stronger for it.
Jennifer Weiss-Wolf is the manager director of the Birnbaum Girls’s Management Heart at New York College Faculty of Legislation.
Insights
L.A. Occasions Insights delivers AI-generated evaluation on Voices content material to supply all factors of view. Insights doesn’t seem on any information articles.
Viewpoint
Views
The next AI-generated content material is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Occasions editorial employees doesn’t create or edit the content material.
Concepts expressed within the piece
-
The writer argues that menopause coverage represents a crucial alternative for California to show management on ladies’s well being points, positioning the state alongside its current position as a “secure haven for abortion rights” and advocate for contemporary democracy. The angle emphasizes that AB 432 addresses two basic healthcare wants: making menopause therapies extra reasonably priced by required insurance coverage protection and bettering care high quality by incentivizing clinician training[1][2].
-
Advocates preserve that the present legislative momentum displays a broader “nationwide motion” for menopause coverage, with 15 states introducing over two dozen payments as of summer season 2025, making this concern akin to the profitable marketing campaign to get rid of gross sales taxes on menstrual merchandise. The invoice particularly requires protection for analysis and remedy choices for perimenopause and menopause with out utilization administration, as decided medically vital by treating suppliers[1][2].
-
Supporters emphasize that menopause impacts roughly 50% of the inhabitants but stays inadequately researched and lined by healthcare techniques, creating important disparities in care significantly for ladies of coloration who usually expertise extra extreme signs[3][4]. The laws mandates that physicians whose affected person inhabitants is greater than 25% ladies take part in persevering with medical training programs on menopause, addressing regarding gaps in supplier information[3][4].
-
The writer frames menopausal ladies as a strong political constituency of 75 million People who deserve accessible, competent healthcare and argues that investing of their well-being strengthens democratic establishments. This attitude positions menopause coverage inside broader pro-democracy discourse, suggesting that supporting this laws advantages not solely present sufferers however future generations[4].
Completely different views on the subject
-
Earlier gubernatorial opposition centered on considerations that menopause laws provisions have been “too far-reaching,” resulting in the veto of comparable laws within the prior yr. The present model makes an attempt to handle these considerations by limiting protection particularly to FDA-approved menopause therapies, although uncertainty stays about whether or not these modifications will fulfill administrative objections[1][2].
-
Healthcare coverage analysts notice potential price implications and acknowledge that whereas related well being impacts might be anticipated following implementation, “doable adjustments in medical science and different elements of well being make stability of impacts much less sure as time goes by.” The evaluation signifies that in 2026, AB 432 would apply to the medical health insurance of roughly 22,207,000 enrollees, suggesting important fiscal concerns[1][2].
-
Considerations exist relating to the persevering with medical training necessities for physicians, significantly the mandate that medical doctors with affected person populations composed of 25% or extra ladies should full menopause coursework. This requirement might doubtlessly influence doctor information and luxury ranges but additionally represents further skilled obligations and administrative burdens for healthcare suppliers[1][2].
-
Broader healthcare coverage debates proceed relating to insurance coverage practices and protection mandates statewide, creating political uncertainty round passage of menopause-specific laws. The invoice’s success stays contingent on navigating these bigger healthcare coverage disputes and securing gubernatorial approval regardless of earlier resistance to related measures[1][2].