NPR’s Steve Inskeep speaks with former Watergate prosecutor Jill Wine-Banks about parallels between President Trump and President Nixon’s use of presidency businesses to go after perceived enemies.
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
In three high-profile situations, the president has used mortgage filings particularly to levy fraud accusations in opposition to perceived adversaries. Along with Prepare dinner, there’s Senator Adam Schiff and New York Lawyer Normal Letitia James. All these accusations come from a Trump appointee on the Federal Housing Finance Company, and also you heard Tam describe how the Justice Division has performed alongside in some circumstances. We’ll take a better take a look at this pattern now with Jill Wine-Banks, who was an assistant particular prosecutor within the Watergate investigation that introduced down President Richard Nixon within the Nineteen Seventies. Welcome to this system.
JILL WINE-BANKS: Thanks, Steve.
INSKEEP: The president says he is elevating issues about an infraction. Does this strike you as an acceptable use of his energy?
WINE-BANKS: It actually doesn’t, and it’s clearly a really biased use of his energy as a result of Ken Paxton, the legal professional normal of Texas, is alleged to have listed three houses as his main residences. However there is not any investigation of Republican Ken Paxton, solely of Democrats.
INSKEEP: That is an fascinating level. Are you saying that is what we would name a selective prosecution or a minimum of a selective accusation?
WINE-BANKS: Completely. That is what I am saying. And I do not belief the Division of Justice to not proceed with selective, unfounded accusations. I do not know the details right here. No person does. So we do not know. And we do know that this sort of accusation would usually not be dealt with by the Division of Justice. It will by no means go to that. It will be resolved out of court docket with some form of process.
INSKEEP: Oh, as a result of if one thing occurred right here, it might be fallacious, nevertheless it’s not such an enormous deal that it might take up the DOJ’s time. Is that what you are saying?
WINE-BANKS: It’s. It will be fallacious, nevertheless it would not be dealt with by the Division of Justice.
INSKEEP: OK.
WINE-BANKS: And we would not find out about it. No person pronounces this sort of factor. It’s in opposition to the foundations of the Division of Justice to announce investigations and to smear somebody’s title with out there being an indictment. That is once we hear about investigations, is when there’s a indictment.
INSKEEP: You are completely appropriate, factually talking, that the Division of Justice usually retains its mouth shut till they’ve an accusation to make in court docket, they usually’re speculated to – it is conventional to say that you just let the indictment communicate for you. Let the filings, the court docket filings, communicate for you. However I believe if somebody from the administration had been right here proper now, they’d say, oh, no, that is the way in which the sport is performed. That is what Democrats do. That is regular. Is there a case that different presidents have, in reality, gone after their enemies, even when they don’t seem to be fairly so blatant about it?
WINE-BANKS: Nicely, there’s one, in fact, which is Richard Nixon, who had an precise enemies checklist. It was one thing that was truly typed up, and it contained the names of politicians, journalists and a few actors. There was just one girl on that checklist. Sadly, it was not me. It was Mary McGrory, who was a columnist. And…
INSKEEP: Sadly, it was not you. You’ll relatively have been on the enemies checklist?
WINE-BANKS: Nicely…
INSKEEP: It was an honor.
WINE-BANKS: …It will be form of a mark of delight now. It will’ve been an honor, as I see it. However sure, I did not, and I form of joke as a result of, in fact, there’s an enormous value concerned in defending your self in opposition to these accusations. It takes legal professionals, and it takes time away from what you are actually doing, so it is not one thing one actually needs to be on.
INSKEEP: Oh, now, thanks for reminding me of that, that even when…
WINE-BANKS: Yeah.
INSKEEP: …You are in the end cleared of the costs, this is usually a super drag on somebody’s life, an amazing punishment simply to be investigated. What had been a number of the levers of federal energy that President Nixon used in opposition to his perceived enemies?
WINE-BANKS: Nicely, he tried to make use of the Inside Income Service, however the commissioner, Don Alexander, truly pushed again. And that is completely different now as a result of Donald Trump has used IRS. We have had audits of, for instance, FBI director Comey.
INSKEEP: Proper.
WINE-BANKS: And that is a really massive time and expense. Nixon additionally tried to make use of – and was extra profitable in utilizing it ‘trigger Alexander pushed again on utilizing IRS. However Hoover did conduct some unlawful wiretaps of journalists and…
INSKEEP: Oh, the FBI director at the moment. Proper. Go on.
WINE-BANKS: Precisely. After which, in fact, there’s famously the Plumbers unit, which was set as much as cease leaks on the White Home. And they’re those who had been accountable for the Watergate break-in, which led to his impeachment. In addition they had been accountable for breaking into Daniel Ellsberg’s psychiatrist’s workplace, looking for some proof – which they did not do – that might be used to smear him as a result of he was releasing the Pentagon Papers, they usually had been very upset about that.
INSKEEP: All this occurred secretly after which was uncovered by your investigation, The Washington Publish and plenty of different issues. In a few seconds, does it shock you that regardless of the president is doing now appears to be within the open?
WINE-BANKS: It is not as a result of that is what he does. He says it out loud and other people settle for it. He is getting us prepared for a dictatorship with all people understanding what he is doing.
INSKEEP: One perspective comes from Jill Wine-Banks, an legal professional and former Watergate prosecutor. Thanks for the time – actually recognize it.
WINE-BANKS: Thanks.
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might fluctuate. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or publication. The authoritative file of NPR’s programming is the audio file.
