FBI Director Kash Patel delivers remarks as President Trump seems on throughout a White Home press convention in August 2025.
Andrew Harnik/Getty Photos
cover caption
toggle caption
Andrew Harnik/Getty Photos
The Trump administration launched a “marketing campaign of retribution” towards senior Federal Bureau of Investigation officers who refused to show loyalty to President Trump, firing them final month for improper political causes earlier than they might gather early retirement advantages, in keeping with a new lawsuit from three senior FBI brokers.
The lawsuit describes leaders contained in the FBI and Justice Division as each partisan and inept — struggling to please the White Home and keen to dismiss anybody who crossed Trump. At his Senate affirmation listening to, FBI Director Kash Patel promised to guard staff from improper political removing. However as soon as he arrived on the bureau’s headquarters, the lawsuit alleges, Patel intentionally selected to observe directives from the White Home reasonably than federal regulation.
“His resolution to take action degraded the nation’s nationwide safety by firing three of the FBI’s most skilled operational leaders, every of them consultants in stopping terrorism and lowering violent crime,” the lawsuit mentioned.

The three plaintiffs are among the many most senior and lauded FBI brokers to have labored on the bureau in current reminiscence. Brian Driscoll gained awards for bravery and valor and led hostage rescue groups earlier than briefly serving as performing FBI director this 12 months. Steven Jensen ran the Washington Subject Workplace and managed some 2,000 staff engaged on nationwide safety and violent crime. Spencer Evans oversaw high-profile investigations together with a Tesla Cybertruck bombing outdoors a Trump resort in Las Vegas this 12 months, in keeping with the lawsuit.
The lads allege their dismissals violated their Fifth Modification proper to due course of and the First Modification’s assure to free affiliation and free speech.
“They have been keen to sacrifice these individuals who had accomplished nothing all of their lives however to guard the American folks, for no different motive, than to be some kind of emblem of revenge or retribution,” Abbe Lowell, an lawyer for the three fired FBI officers, instructed NPR. “Going after folks to make a press release turned extra vital than the core mission of the FBI itself.”
The case marks the second time the bureau has been sued by its personal brokers this 12 months. All three males had served for twenty years on the time of their dismissal. However they might not formally retire as a result of they’d not but reached the age of fifty.
Requested for remark concerning the lawsuit, White Home spokeswoman Abigail Jackson mentioned that “Kash Patel leads the FBI and because the Director he oversees and manages all elements of the company.”
The FBI declined to remark.

White Home asks for loyalty to Trump
For Driscoll, hints of bother started even earlier than the inauguration, the lawsuit alleges. Round mid-January, he acquired a cellphone name asking about his willingness to take a extra senior position on the FBI. A younger, controversial member of the White Home transition staff with minimal expertise requested Driscoll, “When did you begin supporting President Trump?,” inquired about his voting file and solicited his ideas about variety, fairness and inclusion packages.

The lawsuit mentioned Driscoll refused to reply to questions on his voting file and about Trump, since FBI staff are usually not alleged to share private political opinions on the job.
Driscoll received phrase he would quickly be tapped to function the bureau’s performing deputy director, the second in command. However on Inauguration Day, a White Home report itemizing interim heads of companies referred to Driscoll because the performing director. He had been promoted — by mistake. Emil Bove, then a DOJ official, later mentioned it was a “clerical error” that the White Home was “unwilling” to repair, the lawsuit mentioned.
Every week later, Bove, who was serving as performing deputy lawyer normal, pulled apart Driscoll and one other senior FBI official after a safety briefing. Bove instructed them he confronted stress from White Home Deputy Chief of Workers Stephen Miller to see “symmetrical motion on the FBI as had been taking place at DOJ,” in keeping with courtroom papers.
To them, it meant widespread reassignments and terminations, similar to the dismissal of prosecutors who labored on Jan. 6 Capitol riot circumstances and on the groups that probed Trump over mishandling of nationwide safety secrets and techniques and efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Trump up to now has accused the Justice Division of unfairly concentrating on him and his supporters in politically motivated investigations, and sought to reshape the company since he returned to the White Home.

Bove later demanded a listing of FBI staff who took half within the investigations of Jan. 6, 2021 — the most important probe in Justice Division historical past, which Trump unwound with mass clemencies on his first day in workplace this 12 months. Driscoll refused, the lawsuit alleges, saying it will put nationwide safety in danger and violate federal civil service legal guidelines and guidelines.
The dispute reached the media and prompted some FBI brokers to create whimsical memes lauding Driscoll for standing up for the workforce. The lawsuit mentioned that groundswell of help infuriated Bove, who was portrayed in a single video because the Batman villain Bane, whereas Driscoll was depicted as Batman. (Bove has since been promoted to a lifetime-tenured federal decide submit on the appeals courtroom primarily based in Pennsylvania.)
Ultimately, underneath stress, Driscoll put collectively a listing of 6,000 those that included worker identification numbers, not names, in an effort to shield the FBI staff from retaliation and threats.

Deputy director alleged to overly concentrate on social media
Like Driscoll, the Trump administration promoted former FBI agent Steven Jensen solely weeks earlier than it fired him. Jensen helped coordinate the bureau’s response to the siege on the Capitol greater than 4 years in the past. However he was elevated to guide the FBI’s Washington Subject Workplace underneath the company’s new leaders this 12 months.
Jensen labored intently with new FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, a former right-wing podcaster and Secret Service agent. Amongst different duties, the lawsuit says Jensen recurrently briefed Bongino on high-priority investigations into the pipe bombs positioned close to the Capitol on Jan. 6; the leak of the Supreme Courtroom’s draft resolution overruling the fitting to abortion; and the invention of cocaine within the White Home in the course of the Biden administration.

“Throughout these briefings, Jensen turned alarmed at Bongino’s intense concentrate on rising on-line engagement by way of his social media profiles in an effort to vary his followers’ notion of the FBI,” the lawsuit mentioned. “The emphasis that Bongino positioned on creating content material for his social media pages may threat outweighing extra deliberate analyses of investigations.”
The lawsuit additionally particulars Jensen’s interactions with Patel, the FBI director, about disclosing the identify of an FBI agent who labored on a number of politically delicate circumstances. Jensen met with Patel to ask him to not publicly identify the agent, for worry he could be subjected to on-line abuse and threats. The agent’s spouse had solely days to dwell, amid a battle towards stage IV most cancers.
On the finish of the assembly, courtroom papers mentioned, Patel handed Jensen a flashy problem coin inscribed with the phrase “Director” on the high and “Ka$h Patel” on the backside. Such cash are in style within the nationwide safety group as tokens of appreciation, however this one was a lot bigger than ordinary. “Patel instructed Jensen that he needed him to be one of many first recipients of his new problem coin,” the lawsuit mentioned.
Not lengthy after, Jensen and the agent whose spouse fought most cancers have been each fired. Phrase got here on August 8, in a single-page letter signed by Patel.