By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Scoopico
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
Reading: Panama ports deal in jeopardy as U.S.-China proxy battle over strategic canal intensifies
Share
Font ResizerAa
ScoopicoScoopico
Search

Search

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel

Latest Stories

Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 2025 Q4 – Results – Earnings Call Presentation (NYSE:FBIN) 2026-02-13
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 2025 Q4 – Results – Earnings Call Presentation (NYSE:FBIN) 2026-02-13
Watch highlights from day 6 of the Winter Games
Watch highlights from day 6 of the Winter Games
Jrue Holiday’s big night boosts Blazers in win over Jazz
Jrue Holiday’s big night boosts Blazers in win over Jazz
Stream ‘Bound’ Free: Steamy Valentine’s Thriller on Kanopy
Stream ‘Bound’ Free: Steamy Valentine’s Thriller on Kanopy
NYT Pips hints, answers for February 13, 2026
NYT Pips hints, answers for February 13, 2026
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved
Panama ports deal in jeopardy as U.S.-China proxy battle over strategic canal intensifies
News

Panama ports deal in jeopardy as U.S.-China proxy battle over strategic canal intensifies

Scoopico
Last updated: February 13, 2026 4:13 am
Scoopico
Published: February 13, 2026
Share
SHARE


This aerial view shows the Taiwanese cargo ship Yang Ming sailing out of the Panama Canal on the Pacific side in Panama City on October 6, 2025.

Martin Bernetti | Afp | Getty Images

Hong Kong’s CK Hutchison Holdings has threatened legal action against Danish shipping giant A.P. Moller-Maersk after Panamanian authorities tapped the group to temporarily take over operations of two strategic ports at either end of the Panama Canal.

In a statement on Thursday, CK Hutchison warned A.P. Moller-Maersk that “any steps” the Danish group or its subsidiary takes to operate the ports without its agreement will likely “result in legal recourse.” That’s according to CNBC’s translation of the Chinese statement.

The simmering dispute has become a geopolitical flashpoint between Washington and Beijing, with Panama caught in the crossfires.

After U.S. President Donald Trump alleged last year that China was “running the Panama Canal,” CK Hutchison negotiated a $23 billion deal with a BlackRock-led consortium to sell its non-Chinese port subsidiaries. Beijing swiftly intervened, describing the sale as  “kowtowing” to American pressure and stalling the transaction.

Tensions intensified last month when Panama’s Supreme Court ruled that the concession held by a CK Hutchison subsidiary to operate the two ports was “unconstitutional.” The company pushed back, saying it “strongly disagreed” with the ruling and launched arbitration proceedings against Panama.

CK Hutchison on Thursday also said it had notified Panama of the dispute under an investment protection treaty, saying it would pursue “all available recourse including additional national and international legal proceedings.”

APM Terminals, the Maersk subsidiary asked to take over the ports, reportedly said it was not party to the legal dispute and had only offered to step in temporarily “to mitigate the risks that could affect essential services for regional and global trade.”

Maersk shares fell over 3% in Copenhagen on Thursday.

Who has the cards?

The stakes around Panama ports have risen sharply this year. The Panama court’s ruling was seen as a major victory for the U.S., given that the White House has made blocking China’s influence over the global trade artery one of its top priorities.

In its strongest rebuke yet, Beijing warned on Wednesday that the Central American country “will inevitably pay a heavy price both politically and economically,” unless it changes course. Beijing’s Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office called the court ruling “logically flawed” and “utterly ridiculous.”

China also directed state firms to halt talks over new projects in Panama and asked shipping companies to consider rerouting cargo through other ports, Bloomberg reported last week.

The standoff may prove more manageable for Washington than it appears, according to Reva Goujon, a director at advisory firm Rhodium Group. The U.S. retains significant leverage through its treaty with Panama, which could allow it to defend any intervention on national security grounds, she said.

But Beijing has claimed a partial victory, by derailing Washington’s initial plans to acquire CK Hutchison’s global port holdings outright, Goujon said.

China needs to make the U.S. “clawback in Panama as difficult as possible to avoid setting a precedent,” Goujon said, noting that Chinese state-owned shipping giant Cosco’s Chancay port in Peru — a key infrastructure investment by Beijing in Latin America — is also in U.S. crosshairs.

The U.S. has raised sovereignty concerns over the port of Chancay, a deep-water facility near Lima. In a post on X on Thursday, the U.S. State Department’s bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs said Peru could be “powerless” to oversee the critical port which was “under the jurisdiction of predatory Chinese owners.”

For CK Hutchison, its lawfare, however, will likely end in vein, said Peter Alexander, managing director at Z-Ben Advisors. “There’s little CK Hutchison can do even with behind-the-scenes support from Beijing.”

The Panama canal — a crucial trade passage that links the Atlantic and Pacific – handles roughly 40% of all U.S. container traffic each year. CK Hutchison’s subsidiary, Panama Ports Co., has operated them since 1997 and received a 25-year agreement renewal in 2021.

The canal was built in the early 20th century by the U.S. which operated it for decades before handing full control to Panama in 1999.

Analysts expected the dispute to drag on, potentially straining U.S.-China relations already frayed by one year of tariff tensions, Beijing’s tightened grip on rare earth exports, disputes over Taiwan and Washington’s restrictions on tech exports.

CK Hutchison said Thursday that the continued operation of the two ports “depends solely on actions of the Panama Supreme Court and the Panamanian State,” which it cannot control.

[/gpt3]

Stoxx 600, DAX, CAC, FTSE, shares
French researcher in Russian jail faces new espionage cost
Paperwork, Trump photograph, faraway from DOJ web site
Charlize Theron is selecting to be single, she informed ‘Name Her Daddy’
Syria monitor group says not less than 5 ISIS members killed by U.S. retaliatory strikes
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print

POPULAR

Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 2025 Q4 – Results – Earnings Call Presentation (NYSE:FBIN) 2026-02-13
Money

Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 2025 Q4 – Results – Earnings Call Presentation (NYSE:FBIN) 2026-02-13

Watch highlights from day 6 of the Winter Games
News

Watch highlights from day 6 of the Winter Games

Jrue Holiday’s big night boosts Blazers in win over Jazz
Sports

Jrue Holiday’s big night boosts Blazers in win over Jazz

Stream ‘Bound’ Free: Steamy Valentine’s Thriller on Kanopy
technology

Stream ‘Bound’ Free: Steamy Valentine’s Thriller on Kanopy

NYT Pips hints, answers for February 13, 2026
Tech

NYT Pips hints, answers for February 13, 2026

SoCal, Central Coast mountains lions now listed as threatened
U.S.

SoCal, Central Coast mountains lions now listed as threatened

Scoopico

Stay ahead with Scoopico — your source for breaking news, bold opinions, trending culture, and sharp reporting across politics, tech, entertainment, and more. No fluff. Just the scoop.

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • True Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Money
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

2025 Copyright © Scoopico. All rights reserved

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?