Home Oversight and Authorities Reform Committee chairman Rep. James Comer, R-Ky. (pictured proper), and rating member Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., confer throughout a listening to Wednesday on whether or not to carry former President Invoice Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress.
Win McNamee/Getty Photos
conceal caption
toggle caption
Win McNamee/Getty Photos
The Home Oversight Committee voted on Wednesday to carry former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in felony contempt of Congress after the couple defied a congressional subpoena. The testimony demand was filed in reference to the panel’s investigation into the Jeffrey Epstein case.
The panel’s GOP members mentioned they gave the Clintons loads of probabilities to seem, however they refused to indicate for his or her scheduled, closed-door depositions final week. The Clintons have known as the subpoenas legally invalid and mentioned they’ve already shared with the committee what “little data” they know.
Home Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., defended the trouble, quoting Democrats who’ve mentioned nobody is above the legislation.
“This Committee has acted in good religion. We have supplied flexibility on scheduling,” Comer argued forward of the vote. “The response we obtained was not cooperation, however defiance, marked by repeated delays, excuses and obstruction.”
The transfer marks the GOP-led committee’s first referral for contempt costs, underscoring the deep, partisan divide that has dominated the battle over the Epstein case. With the committee’s approval, the difficulty will head subsequent to the total Home. If the Home approves the referrals, they’d transfer to the Justice Division for potential prosecution.
The committee voted 34-8 to carry the previous president in contempt, with two members voting current. 9 Democrats joined with Republicans to advance the measure, highlighting inner tensions over what’s extra necessary: transparency within the Epstein case or defending two of their occasion’s previous normal bearers from a perceived partisan assault. Three Democrats voted to carry Hillary Clinton in contempt.
Democrats who opposed the contempt costs used Wednesday’s listening to to argue that the vote amounted to little greater than political rating settling.
“It is this subpoena solely that Republicans and the chairman have been obsessed about placing all their power behind,” mentioned California Rep. Robert Garcia, the highest Democrat on the panel.
For instance, former U.S. attorneys basic Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Jeff Classes and Merrick Garland additionally didn’t seem after receiving subpoenas — and none of them has been held in contempt. Comer mentioned that was as a result of they submitted written testimony and didn’t recall any data related to the investigation.
Garcia mentioned the Clintons have turned over data to the committee, and supplied options to testify underneath a unique format. Garcia urged Republicans to as an alternative negotiate an interview with President Clinton, noting that he was prepared to cooperate.
Democrats additionally argued that Republicans aren’t critical concerning the Epstein probe, noting that the Division of Justice has failed to totally cooperate with a authorized mandate to launch its tranche of information from investigations into the late intercourse offender.
“All of us agree, all of us wish to hear from former President Invoice Clinton,” mentioned Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., mentioned. “However committee Republicans have didn’t conduct a critical investigation.”
Comer sought to push again all through the listening to, saying Republicans are working to unravel the Epstein case. He famous that on Feb. 9, the panel will just about interview Epstein’s longtime affiliate Ghislaine Maxwell, who’s being held at a federal jail in Texas after she was convicted for intercourse trafficking of a minor and conspiracy. Additionally, Lawyer Normal Pam Bondi will seem in a public listening to earlier than the Home Judiciary Committee subsequent month.
Contempt of Congress is a uncommon cost, although it has been used efficiently in a number of high-profile circumstances. In the course of the Biden administration, two shut allies of President Trump, Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, every served 4 months in jail after failing to cooperate with Democrats for his or her investigation into the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol.
